search for: 21topic

...p  -Hal On 04/26/2018 07:56 AM, Demikhovsky, Elena via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, >   > Can I configure address spaces aliasing for my specific target? > I found this discussion > (_https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/0ZbzzN6t05o_ > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/llvm-dev/0ZbzzN6t05o>) , > where James says “pointers in different address spaces cannot alias”, > but it is not what I see in the code. > I looked for a way to customize address spaces separation in Target, > but I can’t find. > Any thoughts? > Thanks. >   > > * */E...

Hi, Can I configure address spaces aliasing for my specific target? I found this discussion (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/0ZbzzN6t05o) , where James says "pointers in different address spaces cannot alias", but it is not what I see in the code. I looked for a way to customize address spaces separation in Target, but I can't find.

...ent past to determine what useful work might be left of appropriate scope. > > ** > > *Value range propagation pass. *There was a discussion about this > topic > (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/XXqfemtDX74/discussion > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/llvm-dev/XXqfemtDX74/discussion>). > Someone already proposed to do this pass for several years ago GSoC. > But I can’t find the progress of the work. If no progress, then does > it mean that the VRP based on Patterson’s paper need to be implemented > although range analysis has...

Hi everyone, I am very interested in contributing to LLVM project in this year's GSoC. I am new with LLVM, but this is used in the compiler course in my university. So, I am thinking to involve in LLVM development to have a better knowledge of the system. Currently, I am preparing the proposal. One of the project that caught my eyes is "New Transformations and Analysis". Several

Dear All, I am glad to be part of GSoC 2016 with LLVM organization. I am a first year PhD student at IIT Hyderabad, India and my research area is compiler optimizations using polyhedral model. My GSoC 2016 project is to implement Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM [1]. We have a discussion on Polly-dev mailing list [2] on taking a better approach to implement this project. Based upon this

...LoopLoadElimination, LoopDistribution and LICMLoopVersioning (the latter two are off by default). >> >> Value range propagation pass. There was a discussion about this topic (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/XXqfemtDX74/discussion <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/llvm-dev/XXqfemtDX74/discussion>). Someone already proposed to do this pass for several years ago GSoC. But I can’t find the progress of the work. If no progress, then does it mean that the VRP based on Patterson’s paper need to be implemented although range analysis has been implemented? > T...

Hi there, I posted this issue <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=de#!topic/carrierwave/ergk9LaO68k>at the carrierwave-group, but I''m beginning to think this rather is a rails-issue than a problem with carrierwave. The problem''s this: I have 2 models, ''article'' and ''upload''. article has_many :uploads. In my article_controller i

LLVM's Attribute APIs need an overhaul. Current problems ================ First, testing for an attribute on an Argument is slow. llvm::AttributeSet::getAttributes(int) consumed 2% of cycles while optimizing llc during LTO. Our mid-level optimizations are constantly asking if a given argument has some attribute (nonnull, dereferencable, etc), and this is currently linear in the size of the