search for: 21ms

...ppeer' is now Reachable. (25ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (29ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (21ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (23ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (21ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] N...

I've pushed this change already actually. No one seems to know if this option is safe. If you see strange timing-related things happening in libguestfs, let us know! Rich.

...;wodPlayer_NotifyCompletions" and not one had a value of "940" until it did and locked up the application, where it will just keep outputting something along the lines of .... trace:wave:wodPlayer_NotifyCompletions still playing 0x1060120 (152740/151800) trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 21ms (21,21) ....forever. On the second run, 346 instances, until it hit the magic number again and locked up, on the 3rd, 81 instances before it hit it, the 4th, 151. In all cases, the first time the difference is "940", it goes boom. And the values for lpWaveHdr->reserved and wwo->d...

...of RAM */ - " usbcore.nousb" /* disable USB, only saves about 1ms */ - " cryptomgr.notests" /* disable crypto tests, saves 28ms */ - " tsc=reliable" /* don't synch TSCs when using SMP, - saves 21ms for each secondary vCPU */ - " 8250.nr_uarts=1" /* don't scan all 8250 UARTS */ - "%s" /* root=appliance_dev */ - " %s" /* selinux */ - " %s" /* quiet/verbose */ -...

...6), but I''m having some weird problems, considering that on my Gentoo laptop (kernel 2.6.17) it worked fine. If I write: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 20ms loss 20% and then try pinging another machine over eth0, I get a 24ms delay but no packet loss (while on my laptop I get 21ms and a correct packet loss). But what I''m sure you''ll be able to clarify is this: what''s wrong with this command: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: netem delay 20ms # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: netem loss 20% That is what phpnetemgui tries to do,...

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

On my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit desktop, I created an empty Rails project and from another machine, I used ab -n 10 http://210.77.27.169:3000/ to test the performance: =========================================== When I put rails 2.3.3 under vendor/rails: Server Software: WEBrick/1.3.1 Server Hostname: 210.77.27.169 Server Port: 3000 Document Path: / Document Length:

I have been struggling with this issue for about a year now. There were just too many IP phones to choose from at all sorts of price points and not enough information about any of them. Now I am looking at the situation again and if anything it has gotten worse. There are even more phones and all sorts of opinions. For every person that says phone x is great there is someone else complaining