search for: 21mb

Hi all, I have a big .csv file (21Mb with 1000000 rows) it has this shape: x 1 NaN 2 NaN 3 0.23 and so on..... So the first column has x as a header then row number, the second column contains values between -1,1 and NaN for empty values. What should I need to do is: create a new .csv file from this one excluding NaN values and plo...

...> wrote: > Can you extract the relevant part of the heap profile data? > It's all profile data, actually. The heap utilization is massively dominated by the profile reader. > How large is the sample profile data fed to the compiler? > > For this run, the input file was 21Mb. > The indexed format profile size for clang is <100MB. The InstrProfRecord > for each function is read, used and discarded one at a time, so there > should not be problem as described. > Good. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <h...

...up to 1 minute to convert, and then they all have to be merged into a single profile. Also didn't like it. Since all compiles are more or less the same in terms of what the compiler does, I decided to take the top 10 biggest profiles and merge those. That seemed to work. This resulted in a 21Mb profile that I could use as input to -fprofile-sample-use. I started stage 3 of the bootstrap and left it to work. I noticed it was slow, so I thought "we'll need to speed things up". The build never finished. Instead, ninja crashed my machine. It turns out that each clang invoca...

...or a Windows XP share. In short, I'm getting just under 1/2 the speed that I can get if I mount a Linux share on the Windows box and send the files that way. Here are the test results: >From XP to Linux via FTP 47MB/sec >From XP to Linux via SAMBA 40MB/sec >From Linux to XP via CIFS 21MB/sec Now, this is much better than the performance I am getting from our SuSE 9.3 stock servers using the 2.6.5 kernel. This can only get about 10MB/sec. We have tried many different socket options with little to show for the effort.7 Is this to be expected? Is there no way to get the performan...

...l have to be merged into a single profile. Also >> didn't like it. >> >> Since all compiles are more or less the same in terms of what the >> compiler does, I decided to take the top 10 biggest profiles and merge >> those. That seemed to work. This resulted in a 21Mb profile that I could >> use as input to -fprofile-sample-use. >> >> I started stage 3 of the bootstrap and left it to work. I noticed it was >> slow, so I thought "we'll need to speed things up". The build never >> finished. Instead, ninja crashed my m...

...sed synaptic to try to update it but found only the current 2.2 release (same for samba-client and samba-common. I did notice that samba-3.0.7-1.i386.rpm with matching samba-client, samba-swat and samba-common were available for download for fedora. Can I use these for redhat9? The samba for rh9 is 21Mb whereas the fedora version is only 14Mb. What is the difference and when will the rh9 versions be available. Peter Lawrie --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!

Ive had two of them in the last two weeks.. The most recent kernel output is kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000009c kernel: printing eip: kernel: c88132b4 kernel: *pde = 00000000 kernel: Oops: 0000 kernel: ppp_async ppp_generic slhc 3c509 8139too mii ipt_state ipt_LOG ipt_REJECT ipt_ kernel: CPU: 0 kernel: EIP: 0010:[<c88132b4>] Not

...B writes: 2875581 blocks = 1404 MB original mbox : 1420611590 B = 2774632 blocks = 1354 MB rewritten mbox: 1444411190 B = 2821115 blocks = 1377 MB - 93416 VSZ, 91120 RSS - 2295.81s user - 23.99s system - 96% cpu - 39:57.90 total Notes ----- Not counting Dovecot's indexes UW-IMAP wrote 21MB less. But Dovecot wrote 27MB more padding, so just by shrinking it Dovecot would have written 6MB less data. Also because Dovecot writes the file backwards, it needs to do some extra jumping around and overlapping writes, but I guess OS nicely merged them. I'm not exactly sure why UW-IMAP uses...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 Summary: please don't use client-server model for local copies Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/400489/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

R 1.6.1 has been scheduled for November 1. We're makin interim beta versions available via http://cran.us.r-project.org/src/base (ftp://cran.us.r-project.org/pub/R/src/base used to work, but apparently FTP access has been disabled) The filename is R-1.6.1beta_*.tar.gz, where * is the creation date. If you want to help ensure that the final 1.6.1 works satisfactorily on *your* platform,

I wanted to ask to the wine experts something about WINEPREFIX or the crossover bottles... how does the concept of "bottles" compares/differs with the concept of application virtualization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_Virtualization) used by VMware's Thinstall (http://www.thinstall.com/products/virtualization_suite.php) (aside for the .exe container*) and

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

Hi all, as part of adopting Rails in my company I had to go through the hassle of setting up a Rails production environment on Win32 system since we mostly use MS SQL as our database back end and also because we mostly dealing with customers who become green-blue-purple as soon as you mention Unix/Linux and run for the door. I also need to mention that most of our web applications are internal and

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device