search for: 219mb

...ld love to have some assurance it's > expected to work for LLD. > > Simple experiments seem to indicate that it's OK/good. Though a quick > llvm-dwarfdump of gdb_index between the two linkers shows about a 10% > disparity in size (LLD's is smaller) given the same inputs. (219MB v 196MB > of text dumped - I didn't compare the actual section sizes) > > *though honestly I'd be willing to trade startup time for link time 1:1 > even, because builds/links are already long enough that I go off and do > something else - whereas getting GDB start down to 3 s...

...assurance it's >> expected to work for LLD. >> >> Simple experiments seem to indicate that it's OK/good. Though a quick >> llvm-dwarfdump of gdb_index between the two linkers shows about a 10% >> disparity in size (LLD's is smaller) given the same inputs. (219MB v 196MB >> of text dumped - I didn't compare the actual section sizes) >> >> *though honestly I'd be willing to trade startup time for link time 1:1 >> even, because builds/links are already long enough that I go off and do >> something else - whereas getting G...

Hi all, LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the active community. I don't think I need to

Hi all after being a silent reader for some time and not very successful in getting good performance out of our test set-up, I'm finally getting to the list with questions. Right now, we are operating a web server serving out 4MB files for a distributed computing project. Data is requested from all over the world at a rate of about 650k to 800k downloads a day. Each data file is usually