Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "219545".
Did you mean:
21954
2014 Oct 16
3
[LLVMdev] Performance regression on ARM
On 16 October 2014 09:34, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> Interesting. Looks like the problem is in (219545, 219569].
Yes.
> and given the magnitude of the change, I think that the trip-count changes are more likely.
Good point.
> Of course, all of these things are bug fixes :( -- So how do we follow-up on this?
Correctness before performance. Always.
I'll create a bug on this pointing t...
2014 Oct 16
4
[LLVMdev] Performance regression on ARM
Folks,
First win of the benchmark buildbot!
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/graph?plot.0=49.128.2&highlight_run=31861
It seems mandel-2 had a huge regression a few commits ago, and based
on a quick look, it may have to do with the inst combine changes. I
haven't investigated yet, but this is the first time I spot
regressions on test-suite, so I'd like to first congratulate