Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "21431".
Did you mean:
1431
2017 Feb 07
2
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
...esult_baseENS4_8_DeleterEEvEEPbEJPS1_S9_SA_EEvRSt9once_flagOT_DpOT0_
> Questions:
>
> What does it mean?
>
> Are there any compiler-flags that fix this problem?
>
> what specific features is libstdc++ using that cause this issue ?
>
> How does my problem relate to Bug 21431 <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/1fe0cd7f00b549701dad0d242b8ac56ba6ac935d?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fbugs%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D21431&signature=b9bd79ba0fa3ea59> ?
>
> The motivation behind this questions is to understand the differences between libc++ and libstdc++ that leads to...
2017 Feb 07
3
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
...;> Questions:
> >>
> >> What does it mean?
> >>
> >> Are there any compiler-flags that fix this problem?
> >>
> >> what specific features is libstdc++ using that cause this issue ?
> >>
> >> How does my problem relate to Bug 21431 ?
> >>
> >> The motivation behind this questions is to understand the differences
> between libc++ and libstdc++ that leads to this specific error message (on
> Linux) in llvm's orcjit.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ps.: i've also asked this...
2006 Mar 21
1
Valitation only on one page?
Hello there,
I have a "user" object essentially that contains address information
that gets stored in the database. The user can sign up and go through
the whole page before he needs to enter that information which is
associated with a billing process. Without having to write some odd
validation based on the request_uri and passing it to a custom
validation method is there any way
2004 Mar 21
5
PRI issues with TE410P
...00 asterisk
21422 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21423 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21424 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21425 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21426 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21427 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21429 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21430 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21431 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21432 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21433 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21434 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21435 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21436 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21437 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21438 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21439 ? S...
2004 Jan 11
2
Cisco 79xx Ringtones
Hi,
I'm after two very specific ringtones for the 79xx's...
A dog barking, and a horse either galloping or neighing.
I've tried making the sounds, but for some bizarre reason they're not
working. I used to make quite a few ringtones for the 79xx's, but I
seem to have forgotten how to do it! And to top things off, I can't
even find the documentation on Cisco's site
2013 Apr 29
0
libnss_winbind.so spawning many smbd processes
...l/samba/sbin/samba
21426 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21427 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21428 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21429 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21430 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21431 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21432 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21433 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21434 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21435 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba
21438 ? S 0:0...
2004 Nov 16
2
FireWire Security issues
...14.freebsd-hackers
*
* Kerneltrap for pointing us to FreeBSD FireWire drivers
- http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/145
Contact:
--------
Maximillian Dornseif
Laboratory for Dependable Distributed Systems
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
email: dornseif@informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Phone: +49-241-80-21431
Web: http://md.hudora.de/
History:
--------
- 2004-10-26 initial disclosure
- 2004-11-15 updated to contain executive sumary, more details,
example code, history and credits section
- 2004-11-16 CAN-2004-1038 has been assigned to this issue
2017 Feb 08
2
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
...t does it mean?
>>> >>
>>> >> Are there any compiler-flags that fix this problem?
>>> >>
>>> >> what specific features is libstdc++ using that cause this issue ?
>>> >>
>>> >> How does my problem relate to Bug 21431 ?
>>> >>
>>> >> The motivation behind this questions is to understand the differences
>>> between libc++ and libstdc++ that leads to this specific error message (on
>>> Linux) in llvm's orcjit.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>&...