Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "21421".
Did you mean:
1421
2015 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] why we assume malloc() always returns a non-null pointer in instruction combing?
Hi,
When looking into the bug in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21421, I
found a regression test in Transforms/InstCombine/malloc-free-delete.ll
against me to directly fix it. The test is,
define i1 @foo() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
%m = call i8* @malloc(i32 1)
%z = icmp eq i8* %m, null
call void @free(i8* %m)
ret i1 %z
}
According to...
2015 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] why we assume malloc() always returns a non-null pointer in instruction combing?
...detail] that it doesn't recognize
> that the constructor has side-effects.
>
> --
> Mats
>
> On 31 March 2015 at 10:24, Kevin Qin <kevinqindev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> When looking into the bug in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21421, I
>> found a regression test in Transforms/InstCombine/malloc-free-delete.ll
>> against me to directly fix it. The test is,
>>
>> define i1 @foo() {
>> ; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
>> ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
>> %m = call i8* @malloc(i32 1)
>> %z = icm...
2011 Dec 01
0
Are squeeze Xen dom0 kernels subject to this the same IPv6 GSO problem?
...1:0:11::2.80: Flags [.], cksum 0x24e4 (correct), ack 17137, win 716, options [nop,nop,TS val 1086205237 ecr 1771553020], length 0
23:59:00.725659 IP6 (hlim 55, next-header TCP (6) payload length: 1460) 2a00:801:0:11::2.80 > 2001:db8:1f1:f240::2.35241: Flags [.], cksum 0x16de (correct), seq 19993:21421, ack 127, win 9, options [nop,nop,TS val 1771553033 ecr 1086205237], length 1428
23:59:00.725940 IP6 (hlim 63, next-header TCP (6) payload length: 44) 2001:db8:1f1:f240::2.35241 > 2a00:801:0:11::2.80: Flags [.], cksum 0x25f5 (correct), ack 17137, win 716, options [nop,nop,TS val 1086205250 ecr 1...
2011 Dec 13
0
Are Debian squeeze dom0 kernels subject to this same IPv6 GSO problem?
...1:0:11::2.80: Flags [.], cksum 0x24e4 (correct), ack 17137, win 716, options [nop,nop,TS val 1086205237 ecr 1771553020], length 0
23:59:00.725659 IP6 (hlim 55, next-header TCP (6) payload length: 1460) 2a00:801:0:11::2.80 > 2001:db8:1f1:f240::2.35241: Flags [.], cksum 0x16de (correct), seq 19993:21421, ack 127, win 9, options [nop,nop,TS val 1771553033 ecr 1086205237], length 1428
23:59:00.725940 IP6 (hlim 63, next-header TCP (6) payload length: 44) 2001:db8:1f1:f240::2.35241 > 2a00:801:0:11::2.80: Flags [.], cksum 0x25f5 (correct), ack 17137, win 716, options [nop,nop,TS val 1086205250 ecr 1...
2015 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] why we assume malloc() always returns a non-null pointer in instruction combing?
...; >
>> > --
>> > Mats
>> >
>> > On 31 March 2015 at 10:24, Kevin Qin <kevinqindev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> When looking into the bug in
>> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21421, I
>> >> found a regression test in Transforms/InstCombine/malloc-free-delete.ll
>> >> against me to directly fix it. The test is,
>> >>
>> >> define i1 @foo() {
>> >> ; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
>> >> ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
>&...
2015 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] why we assume malloc() always returns a non-null pointer in instruction combing?
...gt; >
>>>> > On 31 March 2015 at 10:24, Kevin Qin <kevinqindev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> Hi,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> When looking into the bug in
>>>> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21421, I
>>>> >> found a regression test in
>>>> Transforms/InstCombine/malloc-free-delete.ll
>>>> >> against me to directly fix it. The test is,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> define i1 @foo() {
>>>> >> ; CHECK-LABEL:...
2004 Mar 21
5
PRI issues with TE410P
...explain why this happens .. however these get cleared once
the channels are handled.
20992 pts/3 S 0:01 zttool
21412 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21413 ? R 0:00 asterisk
21418 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21419 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21420 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21421 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21422 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21423 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21424 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21425 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21426 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21427 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21429 ? S 0:00 asterisk
21430 ? S...
2002 Apr 23
2
Bug in read.table() (PR#1477)
The following command,
temp <- read.table("c:/rfr/r/test.txt")
reads the text file "test.txt", which contains the following lines:
21437
21438
21419-2
21420-2
21421-2
21422-2
and produces the following result:
> temp
V1
1 21437+0i
2 21438+0i
3 0+0i
4 0+0i
5 0+0i
6 0+0i
>
These "numbers" are actually sample ID's, and I expected the presence of the
hyphen would
cause temp to be character or a factor, but it ends up...
2003 Jan 12
10
Shorewall on a file/webserver/router Help
Hi,
I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think)
ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device],
I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and
CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with
shorewall on it.
I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces.
I also what still to alow connection sharing
2010 Feb 05
0
Wine release 1.1.38
...box
21355 Need heap overrun detection
21382 %~dp0 does not expand to right value
21399 iDailyDiary window-drawing problem
21405 IE6 / IE7 crashes with "longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame"
21418 Plants vs Zombies is draw on the top left corner when not in fullscreen
21421 simple Delphi program: popup menu not shown after status bar right clicked.
21442 Visual C++ 2010 beta 2 web installer aborts when starting download
21486 ZEMAX help dialog does not work
21490 Debug build of Chromium aborts on startup because GdiInitializeLanguagePack() is too stubby?
2...
2020 Feb 06
3
How the program spoolss works ?
Hello,
I test samba 4.9.5 in my debian buster . Almost everything works. My
last problem concerns the printers.
I? could need some help explaining my logs .I have this :
/usr/sbin/smbd: reloading printcap cache
/usr/sbin/smbd: reload status: ok
/usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
/usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf
2020 Feb 07
7
How the program spoolss works ?
...t_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
/usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 5537 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
/usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
/usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 21421 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
/usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
/usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 6008 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
/usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed:...