search for: 21342

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "21342".

Did you mean: 1342
2006 Mar 20
1
Location to startup DRb Server
Hello, where (in which file/object) would I invoke the startup of the DRb server to support a rails application? It wouldn''t be config/boot.rb ? How would I shut it down cleanly? Greetings Michael Kastner
2019 Feb 07
2
RFC: [DebugInfo] Improving Debug Information in LLVM to Recover Optimized-out Function Parameters
...s whenever possible, and DW_OP_entry_value is valid through the entire scope of the parameter, the numbers at 91..100 row are relevant indication of improvement with parameter-entry-value. Coverage Parameters Parameters with emit-param-entry-values (% range) (number/%)) (number/%) 0..10 22682/30% 21342/28% 11..20 3498/4% 2337/3% 21..30 3083/4% 1986/2% 31..40 3050/4% 1862/2% 41..50 2534/3% 1574/2% 51..60 2349/3% 1571/2% 61..70 2184/2% 1649/2% 71..80 2620/3% 2069/2% 81..90 3432/4% 2847/3% 91..100 29476/39% 37671/50% Table 1 Location coverage statistics for function parasmeters Improved ba...
2019 Feb 08
3
RFC: [DebugInfo] Improving Debug Information in LLVM to Recover Optimized-out Function Parameters
..._value is valid through the entire scope of the parameter, the numbers at 91..100 row are relevant indication of improvement with parameter-entry-value. > > Coverage Parameters Parameters with emit-param-entry-values > (% range) (number/%)) (number/%) > 0..10 22682/30% 21342/28% > 11..20 3498/4% 2337/3% > 21..30 3083/4% 1986/2% > 31..40 3050/4% 1862/2% > 41..50 2534/3% 1574/2% > 51..60 2349/3% 1571/2% > 61..70 2184/2% 1649/2% > 71..80 2620/3% 2069/2% > 81..90 3432/4% 2847/3% > 91..100 29476/39% 376...
2019 Feb 08
2
RFC: [DebugInfo] Improving Debug Information in LLVM to Recover Optimized-out Function Parameters
...the parameter, the numbers at 91..100 row are > relevant indication of improvement with parameter-entry-value. > > > > Coverage Parameters Parameters with emit-param-entry-values > > (% range) (number/%)) (number/%) > > 0..10 22682/30% 21342/28% > > 11..20 3498/4% 2337/3% > > 21..30 3083/4% 1986/2% > > 31..40 3050/4% 1862/2% > > 41..50 2534/3% 1574/2% > > 51..60 2349/3% 1571/2% > > 61..70 2184/2% 1649/2% > > 71..80 2620/3% 2069/2%...
2020 Feb 06
3
How the program spoolss works ?
Hello, I test samba 4.9.5 in my debian buster . Almost everything works. My last problem concerns the printers. I? could need some help explaining my logs .I have this : /usr/sbin/smbd: reloading printcap cache /usr/sbin/smbd: reload status: ok /usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type /usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf
2020 Feb 07
7
How the program spoolss works ?
...buf to 4760 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND /usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 12623 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND /usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type /usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 21342 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND /usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type /usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 5977 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND /usr/sbin/smbd: send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 12138 failed...