search for: 210p

Hello Group, I'd like to hear your thoughts for the following design. To implement a Voice Gateway solution with atleast 2 PRI (60 channel) capacity, is it better to implement - 1 Grunty Server with a BiPRI card (TE205P, 210P) / Quad PRI (TE405P, TE410P) or - 2 Normal Servers (Dell 420/430 with 2 Gig RAM and 80 Gig SATA) with Single PRI (TE110P) or BiPRI (TE205P, 210P) and Load balance between them. My second question in similar lines is, is it better to implement - 2 single slot ISDN Card or - 1 multiple slot ISDN Car...

I've been asked to assess the cost of implementing Asterisk with a single T1 line in one of our offices. I've had plenty of experience w/ TDM400 cards, but T1 is new for me so a couple of questions: 1) Will I need a digital or analogue interface card? I expect digital is the answer, but the Digium web site said something about analogue cards being able to support "provider T1

...o_loop_run" #17 0x00007fbbd20f1193 in master_service_run (service=0x13af5c0, callback=0x3512) at master-service.c:566 No locals. #18 0x00000000004210d0 in main (argc=1, argv=0x13af390) at main.c:412 set_roots = {0x429200, 0x0} login_set = {auth_socket_path = 0x13a7050 "\210p:\001", postlogin_socket_path = 0x0, postlogin_timeout_secs = 60, callback = 0x4212d0 <login_client_connected>, failure_callback = 0x421270 <login_client_failed>, request_auth_token = 1} service_flags = <value optimized out> storage_service_flags...

...354\004\353m\225\210\272\030\311w\030I)\031\016\206\345\342' from 119.78.236.189 Mar 25 16:21:14 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[4015]: Bad protocol version identification '\354\035\371^\277\376\323\332{0\016Dd\351\237\356\302\252\275\331\315w\306\343\246m\377 at waj\231\374C\236\234\207\210p\363C9}\366\2532xiM\255f\232!\376\335[\363'\b\217!Zp(\314\266\253?' from 210.73.57.141 Mar 25 13:18:36 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[317]: Bad protocol version identification '\301h\355\243\375\2106\005/H\256\001\362\250\365d\333Hd\235\353\322\232&vC\335\003\274\353JB&W\374\...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking