search for: 210k

..., {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {0x8052540, [], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGTERM, {0x8052540, [], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_IGN}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 select(7, [3], [3], NULL, NULL) = 1 (out [3]) write(3, "L\210K\275U\330\352\33p\247\334\324\344\306\231\321\273"..., 56) = 56 select(7, [3], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [3]) read(3, "w.2\247C&\310\330\5]rhP)Y\221;\267\263\30I\321\213\325"..., 8192) = 48 select(7, [3 4], [3], NULL, NULL) = 1 (out [3]) write(3, "\335g\342\317\2...

...s 1 1 98 1 0 0| 0 5624k| 113k 110k| 0 0 |1569 2643 missed 52 ticks 1 1 98 1 0 0| 0 2432k| 29k 28k| 0 0 | 679 647 missed 12 ticks 0 0 100 0 0 0| 0 0 | 60B 374B| 0 0 | 13 15 2 3 94 0 0 0| 0 1872k| 209k 210k| 0 0 |1375 3590 missed 30 ticks The problem is currently occuring, but it doesn't seem to be affecting voice quality for now, so I have some time to try to find the cause. The only solution I've found up to now is to reboot... But hey, this isn't a Windows 98 machine :)!...

...ovecot setup to use the new server, it took a few days to notice that something seems fishy about our full-text search: expected hits wouldn't be shown among the search results. For instance, one of the folders (a shared, read-only folder which is basically a mailinglist archive) with about 210k messages has a plaintext mail with the text 'Amman'. However, logging into the IMAP server and issueing a . SEARCH TEXT Amman In the folder doesn't yield any hits. It seems that this happens for older mails only -- trying other keywords, we did notice hits in recent mails but n...

Hi List! I have an issue with dovecot: Outlook express users sometimes can't see some emails (they are not even listed) that can be seen with other IMAP clients, I tested it (and it works) with Evolution, Outlook and SquirrelMail (a web mail). Please note that this is not the client bug reported at http://dovecot.org/clients.html with the message: "Message is no longer available on

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

...nute_33 538K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_34 564K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_35 596K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_36 638K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_37 796K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_38 226K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_39 210K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_40 211K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_41 145K - 1.98G - home/cjg at minute_42 198K - 1.98G - home/cjg at 2006-02-03-17:45:30 0 - 1.98G - home/cjg at 2006-02-03-17:45:41 0 - 1.98G - home/cjg at 2006-02-03-17:...

...394K 7.45G 2 8 75.2K 231K ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- hyb 2.52G 925G 91 5 985K 210K c10t0d0 2.52G 925G 91 5 985K 210K cache - - - - - - c9t0d0 235M 7.22G 0 10 0 802K ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read w...

...39;' tool. However I have really strange problem with conntrack not seeming to catch outbound connections. This prevents outbound connections working from dom0. Connections from domU''s however /do/ work. The problem appears to boil down to the following: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 210K packets, 18M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 111K 8778K RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- xen-br+ any anywhere anywhere 0 0 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- vif+ any anywhere anywhere 1 73 RH-Firew...

Hi, I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think) ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device], I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with shorewall on it. I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces. I also what still to alow connection sharing

...309.83 clat (usec): min=3, max=211K, avg=1747.01, stdev=1825.79 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=47392, per=1.05%, avg=4193.70, stdev=10657.56 write: io=12,213MB, bw=80,503KB/s, iops=20,125, runt=155350msec slat (usec): min=7, max=26,509, avg=140.56, stdev=308.29 clat (usec): min=2, max=210K, avg=1745.35, stdev=1806.65 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=142480, per=0.47%, avg=5610.50, stdev=22231.49 cpu : usr=3.34%, sys=91.70%, ctx=19922, majf=0, minf=1234 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%,...

...309.83 clat (usec): min=3, max=211K, avg=1747.01, stdev=1825.79 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=47392, per=1.05%, avg=4193.70, stdev=10657.56 write: io=12,213MB, bw=80,503KB/s, iops=20,125, runt=155350msec slat (usec): min=7, max=26,509, avg=140.56, stdev=308.29 clat (usec): min=2, max=210K, avg=1745.35, stdev=1806.65 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=142480, per=0.47%, avg=5610.50, stdev=22231.49 cpu : usr=3.34%, sys=91.70%, ctx=19922, majf=0, minf=1234 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%,...