search for: 21.62

Hi, I have a dataframe basically like this: > head(asturias.gen2011[,c(1,4,9:14)]) municipio total upyd psoe pp iu fac tipo 440 Allande 2031 1.44 31.10 39.75 4.01 21.62 1000-10000 443 Aller 12582 1.37 33.30 37.09 15.53 10.35 10000-50000 567 Amieva 805 1.48 32.69 37.36 6.15 20.16 <1000 849

Hi, I implemented a pattern matching of the dot product for arm64 and it seemed to work well for the basic case, i.e., class mulB<SDPatternOperator ldop> : PatFrag<(ops node:$Rn, node:$Rm, node:$offset), (mul (ldop (add node:$Rn, node:$offset)), (ldop (add node:$Rm, node:$offset)))>; class mulBz<SDPatternOperator ldop> : PatFrag<(ops node:$Rn,

Hello, Is there an easy way to format the output of a result table that R generates from a regression? I like the table, but would like to limit the number of decimal points in the entries if possible. For instance I would like only 3 digits of precision for the Value, Std.Error. (And if it would be easy to get rid of scientific notation, that would be good to know too). So ideally keep the

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

I have a problem to plot label (Year) only for significant values (in this case spoz and sneg). I use this code, but don't work with labels. library(ggplot2) ggplot(data1, aes(x = Year, y = value,fill=type,width=1))+ geom_bar(stat="identity",position="identity")+ scale_y_continuous(breaks = round(seq(-100, 100, by = 10),10))+ theme_bw() Thank you! the data used is:

Instrumentation based Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) is a compiler technique that leverages important program runtime information, such as precise edge counts and frequent value information, to make frequently executed code run faster. It's proven to be one of the most effective ways to improve program performance. An important design point of PGO is to decide where to place the

Accidentally sent to uiuc server. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you compare your results with another approach: simply do not > instrument the top 1% hottest functions (by function entry count)? If this > simple approach provides most of the benefits (my measurements on one > codebase I tested show that it would eliminate

I've rolled up R-0.99.0.tgz a moment ago. You can get it from ftp://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-0.99.0.tgz or http://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-0.99.0.tgz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you within a day or two. There's also a version split in three (!) for floppies if you prefer that. The next release is to be 1.0.0 at the end of this month,

I've rolled up R-0.99.0.tgz a moment ago. You can get it from ftp://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-0.99.0.tgz or http://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-0.99.0.tgz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you within a day or two. There's also a version split in three (!) for floppies if you prefer that. The next release is to be 1.0.0 at the end of this month,

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Accidentally sent to uiuc server. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you compare your results

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

The profile seems to suggest very high latencies on the brick at ovirt1.nwfiber.com:/gluster/brick1/engine ovirt2.* shows decent numbers. Is everything OK with the brick on ovirt1? Are the bricks of engine volume on both these servers identical in terms of their config? -Krutika On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > Hi: > > Thank you. I

Hi all again: I'm now subscribed to gluster-users as well, so I should get any replies from that side too. At this point, I am seeing acceptable (although slower than I expect) performance much of the time, with periodic massive spikes in latency (occasionally so bad as to cause ovirt to detect a engine bad health status). Often, if I check the logs just then, I'll see those call traces

I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down, which is correct: I have one server off) However, in Storage -> domains, they all show down (although

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my > physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the > two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. > > In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down,