search for: 21.36

> On 17 Nov 2017, at 21.36, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > >> On November 16, 2017 at 9:59 AM wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de wrote: >> >> >> > > Hi! > > Thanks for the sample, we were able to identify the problem! Fixed: https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/489af46c6c1ee32fe6a6ff96a8281f2ef5870c8d

I have a value a=300 observation (x) = sample(1:50) How to find a p-value from this. I need to show that "a" is different fom mean(x). Thanks -- ------------- Mary Kindall Yorktown Heights, NY USA [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am finding that the puppetlabs-apache module is somehow adding 30-60 seconds onto a host''s catalog compile time when the puppetmaster has no other hosts contacting or generating catalogs. The Puppetmaster is setup to use Puppet-2.7.18 - Apache & Passenger. RIght now only 2 hosts are even configured to use this new PM, the PM itself and a Foreman host. With neither hosts

Hi! Is it possible to specify different source password for all mounpoints? I tried to found it from docs, but.. If there is some other method to increase security when playing with multiple users and mountpoints, please tell me! - Timo H?kli

I mean different source password for each mountpoint, no listener password.. chiapas at aktivix.org kirjoitti 20.9.2008 kello 21.36: > 2008/9/18 Timo H?kli <timpuri at kepit.fi>: >> Hi! > > Hi > >> Is it possible to specify different source password for all >> mounpoints? > > A different password for each mountpoint? Sure. > >> I tried to

Hi, I am currently testing a 2.1 dovecot setup with fts-solr. Search speed is simply amazing. I decided to try to delete and rebuild the solr indexes, but i can't seem to rebuild them thru dovecot. At first, when telnetting to the imap server, the search initially built the index, and then subsequent searches are blazingly fast. 1- I deleted all the solr indexes with the following query:

hi Today I have been in a puzzling fight with 2 dovecot versions that I would like to ask some comments on. The situation is this: - I have a considerable mail archive in mbox format (yes, I know, but that is what I have..). - My mail reader is mutt 1.5.20 by the way. - Some of these mbox files have names like firstname.initial.lastname Note the . seperating the parts of the email-ers name.

Hello all, I have what feels like a simple problem, but I can't find an simple answer. Consider this data frame: > x <- data.frame(sample1=c(35,176,182,193,124), sample2=c(198,176,190,23,15), sample3=c(12,154,21,191,156), class=c('a','a','c','b','c')) > x sample1 sample2 sample3 class 1 35 198 12 a 2 176 176

Hi all, After a long reading of the LARTC, I were able to set up a working HTB config on my firewall. But my question is : Can I use a "ip less" box to do QoS ? With bridging software (or even without?) or thing like this and use an u32 filter to direct the traffic to the right class ? In other words, I can''t modify the existing network config or inster into (netmask is

Hey, i want to define 3 ideal breaks (bin) for each variable one of those variables is attached in the previous email, i don't want to consider quartile method because quartile is not working ideally for that data set because data distribution is non normal. so i want you to suggest another method so that i can define 3 breaks with the ideal interval for Recency, frequency and monetary to

Hi Your statement about attaching data is problematic. We cannot do much with it. Instead use output from dput(yourdata) to show us what exactly your data look like. We also do not know how do you want to split your data. It would be nice if you can show also what should be the bins with respective data. Unless you provide this information you probably would not get any sensible answer. Cheers

Hi You expect us to solve your problem but you ignore advice already recieved. Your data are unreadable, use dput(yourdata) instead. see ?dput > test<-read.table("clipboard", heade=T) Error in scan(file = file, what = what, sep = sep, quote = quote, dec = dec, : line 115 did not have 6 elements What is ?ideal interval? can you define it? Should it be such to provide eqal

On 2016-05-25 19:13, Kelly Lesperance wrote: > Hdparm didn?t get far: > > [root at r1k1 ~] # hdparm -tT /dev/sda > > /dev/sda: > Timing cached reads: Alarm clock > [root at r1k1 ~] # Hi Kelly, Try running 'iostat -xdmc 1'. Look for a single drive that has substantially greater await than ~10msec. If all the drives except one are taking 6-8msec, but one is very

Hello, I'm working on RFM analysis and i wanted to define my own breaks but my frequency distribution is not normally distributed so when I'm using quartile its not giving the optimal results. so I'm looking for a better approach where i can define breaks dynamically because after visualization i can do it easily but i want to apply this model so that it can automatically define the

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

Return-path: <xxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxx at xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx> Envelope-to: xxxxx at xxxxxxxxx Delivery-date: xxx, xx xxx xxxx xx:xx:xx +xxxx Received: xxxx [xxx.x.x.x] (xxxx=xxxxxxxxx) xx xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx xxxx xxxxx (xxxx x.xx) (xxxxxxxx-xxxx <xxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxx at xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>) xx xxxxxx-xxxxxx-xx xxx xxxxx