search for: 20win32

...using a Rtools but with another compiler? In addition: will I be able to publish this package to CRAN, or do I have to wait for Rtools to get updated with a more recent gcc? [1] https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-c-driver [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.8.3/threads-posix/dwarf/

...aries or else old 1.2.1 users will not get the message when news posts hit. Fortunately, if someone from Xiph wants to take up the call, it is straightforward to set up both i686 and x86_64 flavors of MinGW-w64. 32-bit target: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.2/threads-posix/dwarf/ 64-bit target: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.2/threads-posix/seh/ One extracted, it's just a matter of temporarily adding the relevant bin folder to PA...

...f other errors starting with > > error: '__gthread_time_t' was not declared in this scope > > so gthreads isn't there. > > As to popularity, compare the download graphs for 32 bit: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.0/ > > and 64 bit: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.0/ > > in 32 bit the posix version rules, whereas in 64 bit it is a close winner. > If you go back t...

It sounds like this version of libstdc++ doesn't support std::recursive_mutex from C++11. This is really unfortunate, because we were hoping that moving to C++11 would allow us to use standard, portable threading primitives. Does this version of MinGW have any C++11 threading support? Is it just recursive_mutex that is missing, or do we have to avoid std::mutex, std::call_once, etc? lld

On 6/3/14, Robert Kausch <robert.kausch at freac.org> wrote: > Am 03.06.2014 16:45, schrieb lvqcl: >> 2) to ALL: >> I attached a small program. Compile and run it. >> * Does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -msse2 options? >> * If yes, does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -funroll-loops >> -msse2 options? >> ( and what is the version

...thread_time_t' was not declared in this scope >>> >>> so gthreads isn't there. >>> >>> As to popularity, compare the download graphs for 32 bit: >>> >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.0/ >>> >>> and 64 bit: >>> >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.9.0/ >>> >>> in 32 bit the posix version rules, where...

I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. Olav Sunde At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl wrote: >>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries