search for: 20stage

On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks Galina! Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" Now I remember we used ninja by default because it's easier on Windows (than make). Can you install ninja on that machine? $ sudo apt-get install ninja-build should be enough. Sorry for that! --rena...

...On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >> I applied it and reconfigured the master. > > Thanks Galina! > > Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio > > CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" > > Now I remember we used ninja by default because it's easier on Windows > (than make). > > Can you install ninja on that machine? > > $ sudo apt-get install ninja-build &...

-- The C compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 According to buildbot log here http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio for Simon's example ICE. Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com From: "Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> To: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>, "l...

...But on that commit, the personality routine depends on it for EHABI calls, which is defined by default on ARM environments. The end result is that I can only use Clang 3.9+ to compile libunwind 3.9+. http://buildmaster.tcwglab.linaro.org/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full/builds/1788/steps/build%20stage%201/logs/stdio compiler-rt/lib/builtins/gcc_personality_v0.c:149:57: error: use of undeclared identifier '_URC_OK'; did you mean '_UVRSR_OK'? if (__gnu_unwind_frame(exceptionObject, context) != _URC_OK) ^~~~~~~ Do we take...

On 31 October 2016 at 18:56, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a > fancy configuration. > I have attached the patch, please apply if appropriate. I believe it should just work. Galina, can you give it a try? The build should "just work". :) thanks! --renato

I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks for the heads-up! Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2016 at 18:56, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > > For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a > > fancy configuration. > > I have

...Compiler Crash On 9/1/19 3:39 PM, Jinsong Ji via llvm-dev wrote: -- The C compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 According to buildbot log here http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio for Simon's example ICE. Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. Greetings, That version of gcc seems to be outdated now. For that major version its on 7.4 now so you may want to try that to see if its already been fixed as a regression. If not thats consider...

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/ is an example of the ICE when D64146/rL370584 landed. On 01/09/2019 02:23, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > >> On Aug 31, 2019, at 15:14, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello PowerPC fans, >> >> I am attempting to land D64146 and the PowerPC