Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "20b".
Did you mean:
20
2006 Apr 05
2
bind() fd 6, family 28, port 123 at boot time
...everytime i reboot my
server:
shiva2# tail /var/log/messages
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: ntpd 4.2.0-a Tue Mar 14 04:43:54 UTC
2006 (1)
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: bind() fd 6, family 28, port 123, addr
fe80:1::20b:cdff:fe42:3d63, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't
assign requested address
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: bind() fd 7, family 28, port 123, addr
fe80:2::20b:cdff:fe42:3d62, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't
assign requested address
Apr 5 15:32:47 shiva2 kernel:...
2009 Aug 29
2
RFE: vectorize URLdecode
In R 2.9.2,
> URLdecode(c("a%20b", "b%20c"))
[1] "a b"
Warning message:
In charToRaw(URL) : argument should be a character vector of length 1
all but the first element will be ignored
Could URLdecode be modified to actually process all elements of the vector, not
just the first?
Thanks in advance
2005 Oct 21
3
Openldap for PDC
...occasions lockups where the ldap server does not respond (slapcat will
just hang). I have upgraded to openldap_2.2.13-4.
Is there a recommended version of openldap for SambaPDC?
Does anyone have a system in production using openldap_2.2.13-2 or
openldap_2.2.13-4?
I'm currently using samba3-20b any recommendations for a production
system would be welcome.
2003 Sep 11
1
samba(PDC, machine A) + LDAP (machine B)?
Hello=20all,
=20=20I=20am=20wondering=20if=20anyone=20successfully=20built=20samba=20PDC=20=
on
mahine=20A=20and=20used=20LDAP=20on=20machine=20B=20for=20authentication?
=20=20Because=20now=20before=20creating=20a=20samba=20account,=20one=20must
create=20an=20unit=20account,=20right?
=20=20My=20goal=20is=20as=20follows:
1.=20Master=20LDAP=20(server=20A):=20responsi...
2012 Aug 28
5
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
...0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)...
I schedule the following instruction (48B):
0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
IntRegs:%vreg31
24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&...
2006 Oct 18
1
Eth0 in Promisc mode
Hello,
Is it normal that eth0 in domain0 is in promisc mode ?
[root@vmaster ~]# ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0B:CD:4D:C4:8A
inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Bcast:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:
255.255.255.248
inet6 addr: fe80::20b:cdff:fe4d:c48a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3602633 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1783212 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:917612517...
2017 Apr 07
2
[Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
...7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen
-rw------- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214
When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen.
--
Daniel J. Luke
2012 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
...:
>
> 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
> IntRegs:%vreg31
> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<...
2017 Apr 07
3
[Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
...----- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs
>> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs
>> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs
>> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log
>> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen
>> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214
>>
>> When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen.
>
> Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap?
Sure, that fixes that, but I end up with lots of log mes...
2012 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
...le the following instruction (48B):
0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
IntRegs:%vreg31
24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<...
2016 Dec 22
1
Spill hoisting on RAL: looking for some debugging ideas
...Checking redundant spills for 0 at 16r in %vreg19
[16r,96B:0)[144B,240B:1)[296r,416B:2)[416B,456r:3)[472r,592B:4) 0 at 16r
1 at 144B-phi 2 at 296r 3 at 416B-phi 4 at 472r
Merged to stack int: SS#0 [16r,592B:0) 0 at x
hoisted: 16r STbo %vreg19, <fi#0>
Result just prior to rewriting:
20B STbo %vreg19, <fi#0>
24B STbo %vreg19<kill>, <fi#0>
---
Original code is like this:
int foo(int fst, int snd, int *links) {
int ptr;
for (ptr = fst; ptr != 0; ptr = links[ptr])
mrglist();
for (ptr = snd; ptr != 0; ptr = links[ptr])
cpylist(...
2005 Apr 27
2
Xen configuration
Question about bridge configuration on the host and virtual machine side.
I am not able to correctly configure xen so that the virtual machine can
access the network. Any suggestions would really be appreciated.
Gary
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2012 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] MC Register mapping question (MCRegUnitIterator )
...le the following instruction (48B):
>
> 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
> IntRegs:%vreg31
> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&...
2012 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
...le the following instruction (48B):
0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
IntRegs:%vreg31
24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<...
2005 Oct 16
4
Samba 3.0.20b - still getting "Winbind Dead but subsys locked"
I can remove the /var/locl/subsys/winbindd file to clear the subsys locked
message but this does not chnage the winbind crash problem.
I originally noticed this problem on 20a and thought that 20b had a fix for
the winbind crash.
Any clues?
I am running RH ES 4.0 64 bit with samba packages downlaoded from
enterprisesamba.com.
PC
2012 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] MC Register mapping question (MCRegUnitIterator )
...0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
>> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
>> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
>> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
>> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
>> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
>> IntRegs:%vreg31
>> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
>> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
>> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<&l...
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think
> I am getting more context on it. Please take a look...
>
> So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it
> does something like this:
>
> // Move the instruction to its new
2012 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] MC Register mapping question (MCRegUnitIterator )
...LLVM BB %entry
> >> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
> >> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
> >> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
> >> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
> >> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
> >> IntRegs:%vreg31
> >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
> >> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
> >> IntRegs:%vreg106<<&l...
2017 Apr 07
0
[Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
...w.cfs
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen
> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214
>
> When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen.
> --
> Daniel J. Luke
Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap?
Aki
2012 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
...:
>
> 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2
> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27
> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0;
> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30
> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
> IntRegs:%vreg31
> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26
> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216;
> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<...