search for: 209m

...ry called lucene-indexes. > > This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but just hasn't been fixed yet. That directory already exists. mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ total 429344 -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _...

...not attempted, this is a known bug, but just hasn't been fixed yet. >> >> That directory already exists. >> >> mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox >> >> % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ >> total 429344 >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs >> -rw...

...s way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but just hasn't been fixed yet. > > That directory already exists. > > mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox > > % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ > total 429344 > -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs > -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs > -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs > -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs > -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs > -rw------- 1 dluke dl...

...just hasn't been fixed yet. > >> > >> That directory already exists. > >> > >> mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox > >> > >> % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ > >> total 429344 > >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs > >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs > >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs > >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs > >> -rw------- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _3...

On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs before that. > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with 2.2.28

...- 1 root root 46897152 Jul 13 17:12 rsync/old/NoTouching.mp3 # Disk space usage is increased accordingly: > df -hT /test/*/ Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg-test_btrfs btrfs 1.0G 164M 219M 43% /test/btrfs /dev/mapper/vg-test_rsync btrfs 1.0G 209M 174M 55% /test/rsync Note that I am not asking for rsync to duplicate the subvolume or snapshot functionality. Just recognize that the same file exists in multiple locations kind of like a hard link but not. It seems to me the quickest way to accomplish this would be to add an option that work...

...87.0 id, 0.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.2 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 8192128 total, 7861724 used, 330404 free, 222484 buffers KiB Swap: 2104476 total, 84064 used, 2020412 free, 5327096 cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 14430 jmoe 20 0 1973m 209m 45m S 18.2 2.6 80:11.73 gnome-shell 22624 jmoe 20 0 2926m 1.0g 1.0g S 8.9 13.1 35:06.52 VirtualBox 14125 root 20 0 366m 118m 26m S 3.0 1.5 30:18.57 Xorg 16393 jmoe 20 0 1245m 248m 51m S 1.7 3.1 9:07.27 firefox 24200 jmo...