search for: 209g

...ot; ALL | awk '{s+=$2}END{printf("%.2fMB\n", s/1024/1024);}' 189247.67MB .. 185G use "du" to get size on disc: In my case with deduplication: /srv/stroage/# du -s -h * 53G vmail 75G vmail_sis without deduplication /srv/stroage/# du -s -h -l * 53G vmail 209G vmail_sis j4i, SIS can't use the zlib plugin so the 75G in my case are not compressed (I haven't a filesystem that I trust and has a compression feature). Anyway it has a 3:1 ratio in my case. Maybe I interpret the SIS wrong and SIS couldn't be counted with du -l (count links)....

...I'm starting to play with glusterfs, and I'm having a problem with the df output. The value seems to be wrong. (on the client) /var/mule-client$ du -sh 584K . /var/mule-client$ df -h /var/mule-client/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on glusterfs 254G 209G 32G 88% /var/mule-client (on the server) /var/mule$ du -sh 584K . Is it a known issue ? I've mounted /var/mule-client using glusterfs -f mycnffile /var/mule-client My client runs : glusterfs --version glusterfs 1.3.12 built on Dec 10 2008 11:32:16 Repository revision: glusterfs...

Hi, may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. Thanks for hints! /G?tz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5571 bytes Desc: S/MIME

Gluster-user folks, I'm trying to use gluster in a way that may be a considered an unusual use case for gluster. Feel free to let me know if you think what I'm doing is dumb. It just feels very comfortable doing this with gluster. I have been using gluster in other, more orthodox configurations, for several years. I have a single system with 45 inexpensive sata drives - it's a