Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "209abd96".
2012 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
> Thanks for the reply. I have not specified optimization level explicitly
> during compilation. For GCC default is O0 ie., no optimization. Do you mean
> that clang uses other optimization level other than O0 ?
No, here it's still -O0. However it makes no sense to compare the size
of unoptimized code.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics,
2012 Feb 24
1
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
...W_AT_inline is not present in assembly output.
Could anyone let me know why DW_AT_inline is not emitted ?
I am aware that Clang uses C99 mode by default.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120224/209abd96/attachment.html>
2012 Feb 16
3
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
Hello Anton,
Thanks for the reply. I have not specified optimization level explicitly
during compilation. For GCC default is O0 ie., no optimization. Do you mean
that clang uses other optimization level other than O0 ?
Could you please clarify ?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info
> wrote:
> Hello
>
> > The prologue length in