search for: 209abd96

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "209abd96".

2012 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
> Thanks for the reply. I have not specified optimization level explicitly > during compilation. For GCC default is O0 ie., no optimization. Do you mean > that clang uses other optimization level other than O0 ? No, here it's still -O0. However it makes no sense to compare the size of unoptimized code. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics,
2012 Feb 24
1
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
...W_AT_inline is not present in assembly output. Could anyone let me know why DW_AT_inline is not emitted ? I am aware that Clang uses C99 mode by default. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120224/209abd96/attachment.html>
2012 Feb 16
3
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
Hello Anton, Thanks for the reply. I have not specified optimization level explicitly during compilation. For GCC default is O0 ie., no optimization. Do you mean that clang uses other optimization level other than O0 ? Could you please clarify ? On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > Hello > > > The prologue length in