search for: 208k

...device major 3 [ 3240.203142] blkfront: hda1: barriers enabled [ 3240.203930] blkfront: hda2: barriers enabled [ 3240.300872] /build/buildd/linux-source-2.6.22-2.6.22/debian/build/custom-source-xen/drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0) [ 3240.300885] Freeing unused kernel memory: 208k freed [ 3240.547615] Capability LSM initialized [ 3240.554750] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.0-ioctl (2006-10-12) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com [ 3240.625305] thermal: Unknown symbol acpi_processor_set_thermal_limit (kernel stop) xen log: ... [2007-10-13 21:06:47 xend 4818] DEBUG (DevController:...

...en I run the top command, it results as below: Tasks: 163 total, 1 running, 162 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.9% us, 4.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 93.3% id, 0.8% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 3895444k total, 3163192k used, 732252k free, 352344k buffers Swap: 2097144k total, 208k used, 2096936k free, 2487636k cached Why could the system be utilizing such high memory ? Any ideas ?? By the way, the server is not running other processes.. The samba version running in it is 3.0.33-0.17 I am confused what could be going wrong....

Good morning, I try to use the last release of ext3 patch with a 2.4.10 linux kernel. I have two troubles : - when the kernel is booting, I receive : NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 208k freed Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -1) Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -2) Why my root filesystem (ext3) is seen by the kernel as an ext2 filesystem ? - the second trouble... When I restart the linux box (a Toshiba 4060 XCDT), the root filesystem seems to be not clean and...

...12230.736456] Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes) [12230.738388] Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) [12230.738609] Software IO TLB disabled [12230.752849] Memory: 1378816k/1441792k available (2343k kernel code, 54432k reserved, 1193k data, 208k init) [12230.752895] SLUB: Genslabs=22, HWalign=64, Order=0-1, MinObjects=4, CPUs=4, Nodes=1 [12230.819270] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5631.58BogoMIPS (lpj=11263161) [12230.819304] Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized [12230.819314] SELinux: Disabled at boot. [12230.819328]...

...M 4.96G 0 14 0 1.03M c10d1s0 - - 0 14 0 1.03M c11d0s0 - - 0 14 0 1.03M raidz2 2.24T 19.5T 33 8 1.23M 417K c14t9d0 - - 11 2 212K 42.3K c14t10d0 - - 11 2 208K 42.3K c14t11d0 - - 12 2 211K 42.3K c14t12d0 - - 11 2 211K 42.3K c14t13d0 - - 11 2 207K 42.3K c14t14d0 - - 12 2 211K 42.3K c14t15d0 - - 11 2 211K 42.3K c14t16d0...

...able.ht_locks[i].ht_lock] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k load: 0.11 cmd: zsh 40188 [zfs:&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k Worked for a while then that stopped working too (was over ssh). When trying a local login i only got load: 0.09 cmd: login 1611 [zfs] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 208k I found one post like this earlier (by Xin LI), but nobody seemed to have replied... in my current conf, I think my kmem/kmem_max is at 512Mb (not sure though, since I've edited my file yesterday for next reboot), with 2G of system RAM.. Normally I'd run kmem(max) 1G (with arcsize of...

...t /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd First hard disk /dev/sda Second hard disk /dev/sdb The problem is in first hard disk show above size but my email box folders having below result. du -hs /* 8.0K /backup 7.5M /bin *382G /bkhdd* 89M /boot 4.0K /cgroup 4.0K /command 208K /dev 79M /etc *386G /home* 4.0K /isoqlog.domains 322M /lib 20K /lost+found 4.0K /media 0 /misc 4.0K /mnt 0 /net 64M /root 14M /sbin 4.0K /selinux 4.0K /service 4.0K /srv 680K /tmp 4.3G /usr 1.9G /var Here /bkhdd is mount in /dev/sdb...

Hello, I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the apparent-size left as the full size? In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT IMAGES" and its output seems to indicate what I would expect where "ls -lh" shows the full apparent size

Hello, I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the apparent-size left as the full size? In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT IMAGES" and its output seems to indicate what I would expect where "ls -lh" shows the full apparent size

...t /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd First hard disk /dev/sda Second hard disk /dev/sdb The problem is in first hard disk show above size but my email box folders having below result. du -hs /* 8.0K /backup 7.5M /bin *382G /bkhdd* 89M /boot 4.0K /cgroup 4.0K /command 208K /dev 79M /etc *386G /home* 4.0K /isoqlog.domains 322M /lib 20K /lost+found 4.0K /media 0 /misc 4.0K /mnt 0 /net 64M /root 14M /sbin 4.0K /selinux 4.0K /service 4.0K /srv 680K /tmp 4.3G /usr 1.9G /var Here /bkhdd is mount in /dev/sdb...

Hi , Can any one please let me know how to capture all the boot messages of the Guest OS into a text file? I do xm create -c /etc/xen/hvm.cfg to boot the guest OS. Thanks Kishore _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi John, Ashish, Still no luck . I have tried your commands in root folder. It's showing max size 384 only in home directory. But if i try df -h shown 579. Is there any way to find out recycle bin folder On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Ashish Yadav <gwalashish at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chandran, > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Chandran Manikandan <tech2mani at

...ize is not related to the "apparent" size, as you can easily prove: $ qemu-img create -f qcow2 huge.qcow2 1T Formatting 'huge.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=1099511627776 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16 $ ls -lh huge.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 rjones rjones 208K Jun 17 09:09 huge.qcow2 If you use raw files, then the file apparent size and virtual size are the same. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual...

...ize is not related to the "apparent" size, as you can easily prove: $ qemu-img create -f qcow2 huge.qcow2 1T Formatting 'huge.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=1099511627776 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16 $ ls -lh huge.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 rjones rjones 208K Jun 17 09:09 huge.qcow2 If you use raw files, then the file apparent size and virtual size are the same. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual...

...t;apparent" > size, as you can easily prove: > > $ qemu-img create -f qcow2 huge.qcow2 1T > Formatting 'huge.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=1099511627776 encryption=off > cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16 $ ls -lh > huge.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 rjones rjones 208K Jun 17 09:09 huge.qcow2 > > If you use raw files, then the file apparent size and virtual size are > the same. > > Rich. >

...ib/libsec.so.1 > FF300000 8K rwx-- [ anon ] > FF310000 24K r-x-- /lib/libpam.so.1 > FF326000 8K rwx-- /lib/libpam.so.1 > FF330000 40K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0.2.8 > FF348000 16K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0.2.8 > FF350000 208K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0.2.8 > FF392000 24K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0.2.8 > FF3A0000 8K r-x-- /lib/libdl.so.1 > FF3B0000 176K r-x-- /lib/ld.so.1 > FF3EC000 8K rwx-- /lib/ld.so.1 > FF3EE000 8K rwx-- /lib/ld.so.1 > FF3F8000...

I'm running CentOS 5.1 with all updates, and the xen kernel. For some reason the OS is not seeing the full amount of ram. #uname -a Linux CentOS-VM-A 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5xen #1 SMP Tue May 20 10:03:27 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 6104064 3445136 2658928 0 1412236

...0 0| 40k 2744k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 277 60 0 0 50 50 0 0| 16k 3536k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 330 59 0 0 50 50 0 0|8192B 1016k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 98 16 0 0 59 41 0 0| 80k 4320k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 108 100 0 0 48 52 0 0| 16k 208k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 80 89 0 0 46 54 0 0| 56k 0 | 308B 178B| 0 0 | 38 68 0 0 42 58 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 11 11 0 0 54 45 0 0|1264k 752k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 282 428 0 0 53 47 0 0| 0 360k| 66B 178B|...

...0 0| 40k 2744k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 277 60 0 0 50 50 0 0| 16k 3536k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 330 59 0 0 50 50 0 0|8192B 1016k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 98 16 0 0 59 41 0 0| 80k 4320k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 108 100 0 0 48 52 0 0| 16k 208k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 80 89 0 0 46 54 0 0| 56k 0 | 308B 178B| 0 0 | 38 68 0 0 42 58 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 11 11 0 0 54 45 0 0|1264k 752k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 282 428 0 0 53 47 0 0| 0 360k| 66B 178B|...

...ry fine. dmesg reports: Memory: 4107008k/5242880k available (1929k kernel code, 86836k reserved, 864k data, 176k init) However if I boot a xen-3.0.3 kernel, it only sees about half of this: The xen dmesg reports: Memory: 183852k/270336k available (3531k kernel code, 77948k reserved, 1250k data, 208k init) However ''xm info'' shows: total_memory : 3071 This is running a source install of Xen 3.0.3 with kernel 2.6.16.29 I have checked the kernel configuration that Etch uses, compared to my Xen kernel, and see that Etch is using "Discontiguos Memory" mod...