search for: 20886

...(by source code inspection) in the latest dev snapshot, which is nut-2.0.3-pre2. I'm using nut-2.0.2 myself. The problem is when I'm connecting to my APC UPS using the hiddev driver. I get error messages every 5 seconds in my syslog that look like: Dec 27 19:18:39 localhost hidups[20886]: Unhandled event: 0x8500d1 (1) Dec 27 19:18:39 localhost hidups[20886]: Unhandled event: 0x850043 (0) Dec 27 19:18:39 localhost hidups[20886]: Unhandled event: 0x840073 (0) Dec 27 19:18:39 localhost hidups[20886]: Unhandled event: 0x85004b (0) Dec 27 19:18:39 localhost hidups[20886]: U...

I''ve got a User model, which holds the following (excerpt): def try_to_authenticate User.authenticate(self.username, self.password) end .. private def self.hash_password(password) Digest::SHA1.hexdigest(password) end def self.authenticate(username, password) @user = User.find(:all, :conditions => ["username = ? AND password = ?",

-1 -- switch to PR's +1 -- Hal's compromise proposal (as long as I can continue to use Phab) I agree that the documentation could be better, but I don't see that as a justification for switching from a superior tool to an inferior one. Let's work on the documentation first, then if there's still a compelling reason to switch, do it then, I share most of the concerns already

...se+Asserts/AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/Release+Asserts/AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.o differ: byte 223462, line 2183 ./lib/Target/AArch64/Release+Asserts/AArch64RegisterInfo.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/Release+Asserts/AArch64RegisterInfo.o differ: byte 20886, line 17 ./lib/Target/AArch64/InstPrinter/Release+Asserts/AArch64InstPrinter.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/InstPrinter/Release+Asserts/AArch64InstPrinter.o differ: byte 332540, line 591 ./lib/Target/AArch64/AsmParser/Release+Asserts/AArch64AsmParser.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Ta...