Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "206efebb".
Did you mean:
2060f0bb
2018 Feb 05
0
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
You mounting it to the local bricks?
struggling with same performance issues
try using this volume setting
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-January/033397.html
performance.stat-prefetch: on might be it
seems like when it gets to cache it is fast - those stat fetch which
seem to come from .gluster are slow
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at
2018 Feb 04
2
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
An update, and a very interesting one!
After I started stracing rsync, all I could see was lstat calls, quite slow
ones, over and over, which is expected.
For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2cee_DSC05339_thumb-161x107.jpg",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
I googled around and found
https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is seeing
this
2018 Feb 05
2
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
...rs mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180205/206efebb/attachment.html>