search for: 2066,7

...nment(&env, &envsize); #endif /* USE_PAM */ + if (xauthfile) + child_set_env(&env, &envsize, "XAUTHORITY", xauthfile); if (auth_get_socket_name() != NULL) child_set_env(&env, &envsize, SSH_AUTHSOCKET_ENV_NAME, auth_get_socket_name()); @@ -2039,6 +2066,7 @@ session_setup_x11fwd(Session *s) { struct stat st; + int fd; if (no_x11_forwarding_flag) { packet_send_debug("X11 forwarding disabled in user configuration file."); @@ -2067,6 +2095,28 @@ debug("x11_create_display_inet failed."); return 0; } + + if (optio...

Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. You can read all about the latest improvements and bug-fixes in the NEWS file: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.7pre1-NEWS For the tar file itself, you'll find it here (with its signature):

...enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs nv50_sor_help = { .atomic_check = nv50_outp_atomic_check, - .enable = nv50_sor_enable, - .disable = nv50_sor_disable, + .atomic_enable = nv50_sor_enable, + .atomic_disable = nv50_sor_disable, }; static void @@ -2066,7 +2119,7 @@ nv50_disp_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state) outp->clr.mask, outp->set.mask); if (outp->clr.mask) { - help->disable(encoder); + help->atomic_disable(encoder, state); interlock[NV50_DISP_INTERLOCK_CORE] |= 1; if (outp->flush_disab...

...= vmci_get_context_id(); + + if (cid == VMCI_INVALID_ID) + return -EINVAL; + + if (cid != VMCI_HOST_CONTEXT_ID) + vmci_transport.features |= VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H; + /* Create the datagram handle that we will use to send and receive all * VSocket control messages for this context. */ @@ -2066,7 +2091,7 @@ static int __init vmci_transport_init(void) goto err_destroy_stream_handle; } - err = vsock_core_init(&vmci_transport); + err = vsock_core_register(&vmci_transport); if (err < 0) goto err_unsubscribe; @@ -2097,7 +2122,7 @@ static void __exit vmci_transport_exit...

...rm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port); + port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); if (!port) return -EINVAL; txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); if (!txmsg) { - drm_dp_put_port(port); + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -1799,7 +2066,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, ret = 0; } kfree(txmsg); - drm_dp_put_port(port); + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); return ret; } @@ -1888,7 +2155,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) if (vcpi) {...

...p_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); > if (!port) > return -EINVAL; > > txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!txmsg) { > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > return -ENOMEM; > } > > @@ -1799,7 +2066,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > ret = 0; > } > kfree(txmsg); > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > return ret; > } > @@ -1888,7 +2155,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm...

...t; > > > > > txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!txmsg) { > > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1799,7 +2066,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > > > ret = 0; > > > } > > > kfree(txmsg); > > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > > > > > retu...

...if (!port) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!txmsg) { > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > > > @@ -1799,7 +2066,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > > ret = 0; > > } > > kfree(txmsg); > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > > > return ret; > > } > > @@ -1888,...

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Hi all, Here''s a work in progress series whcih does a partial revert of the previous swiotlb changes, and does a partial replacement with Becky Bruce''s series. The most important difference is Becky''s use of phys_addr_t rather than page+offset to represent arbitrary pages. This turns out to be simpler. I didn''t replicate the map_single_page changes, since

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a