Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "2042,12".
Did you mean:
204,12
2019 Jul 16
2
[PATCH libnbd] generator: Define new Closure type
** INCOMPLETE **
This is the generator change as discussed on the list already.
The Python and OCaml bindings are not yet done.
It passes all [C only] tests and valgrind.
Note that nbd_add_close_callback is inconsistent with other closure
types because it passes the user_data parameter after the function.
(This is not caused by the current patch, it was already
inconsistent). We decided that
2019 Jul 16
0
[libnbd PATCH 2/2] RFC: generator: Handle shared callbacks in Python
...name="callback";
+ cbargs=[ Int64 "cookie";
+ Mutable (Int "error") ]}]);
Flags "flags" ];
ret = RInt64;
permitted_states = [ Connected ];
@@ -2042,12 +2060,13 @@ cause a deadlock.";
"aio_block_status", {
default_call with
args = [ UInt64 "count"; UInt64 "offset";
- Opaque "data";
- CallbackPersist ("extent", [Opaque "data"; String "metac...
2019 Jul 16
3
[RFC libnbd PATCH 0/2] Start fixing python nbd.pread_structured_callback
Posting now that I got something to compile (at the expense of
breaking OCaml bindings), but I'm open to ideas on how to improve it.
Eric Blake (2):
generator: Tweak print_c_arg_list to take alternate first arg
RFC: generator: Handle shared callbacks in Python
generator/generator | 556 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 280 insertions(+), 276 deletions(-)
--
2019 Jul 16
0
[PATCH libnbd v2] generator: Define new Closure type instead of callbacks.
...ror") ]);
+ Closure (true,
+ [ {cbname="callback";
+ cbargs=[Int64 "cookie"; Mutable (Int "error")]} ]);
Flags "flags" ];
ret = RInt64;
permitted_states = [ Connected ];
@@ -2042,12 +2050,12 @@ cause a deadlock.";
"aio_block_status", {
default_call with
args = [ UInt64 "count"; UInt64 "offset";
- Opaque "data";
- CallbackPersist ("extent", [Opaque "data"; String "metac...
2019 Jul 16
2
[PATCH libnbd v2] generator: Define new Closure type
As before, but this one has working Python bindings. OCaml still TBD.
Rich.
2000 Aug 26
0
New chroot patch, for 2.1.1p4
...; (eval $ac_link) 2>&5; } && test -s conftest${ac_exeext}; then
+if { (eval echo configure:2021: \"$ac_link\") 1>&5; (eval $ac_link) 2>&5; } && test -s conftest${ac_exeext}; then
rm -rf conftest*
eval "ac_cv_func_$ac_func=yes"
else
@@ -2042,12 +2044,12 @@
for ac_func in entutxent getutxent getutxid getutxline pututxline
do
echo $ac_n "checking for $ac_func""... $ac_c" 1>&6
-echo "configure:2046: checking for $ac_func" >&5
+echo "configure:2048: checking for $ac_func" >&5...