Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "202mb".
Did you mean:
200mb
2019 Jan 05
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 0/7] server: Implement NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN.
...89MiB/s (198MB/s)(22.1GiB/120001msec)
write: IOPS=48.3k, BW=189MiB/s (198MB/s)(22.1GiB/120001msec)
With multi-conn (-C 8):
memory:
read: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec)
write: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec)
file:
read: IOPS=49.2k, BW=192MiB/s (202MB/s)(22.5GiB/120001msec)
write: IOPS=49.2k, BW=192MiB/s (202MB/s)(22.5GiB/120001msec)
So you can see that the file plugin doesn't move at all, which is not
too surprising since perf shows that it is entirely blocked on Linux
filesystem calls. IOW something in the kernel seems to be the
proble...
2019 Jan 05
4
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 0/7] server: Implement NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 05:26:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/4/19 4:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > First thing to say is that I need to do a *lot* more testing on this,
> > so this is just an early peek. In particular, although it passed
> > ‘make check && make check-valgrind’ I have *not* tested it against a
> > multi-conn-aware client such as the
2012 Dec 22
7
9.1 minimal ram requirements
Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements
for 9.1, has anybody tested it?
e.g.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314
--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.