search for: 2025ms

...39; is now TOO LAGGED! (2020ms / 2000ms) Aug 22 06:39:59 NOTICE[6964]: chan_sip.c:8475 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'broadvoice-in' is now REACHABLE! (20ms / 2000ms) Aug 22 09:38:34 NOTICE[6964]: chan_sip.c:8481 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'broadvoice-in' is now TOO LAGGED! (2025ms / 2000ms) Aug 22 09:38:44 NOTICE[6964]: chan_sip.c:8475 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'broadvoice-in' is now REACHABLE! (19ms / 2000ms)

..."><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">-- I restart my IP-phone --<br> <br> <font color="#3333ff">asterisk*CLI> <br> [Apr 17 11:22:58] NOTICE[24072]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'testcorp3' is now Lagged. (2025ms / 2000ms)<br> [Apr 17 11:23:05] NOTICE[24072]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'testcorp3' is now Reachable. (31ms / 2000ms)<br> [Apr 17 11:23:05] NOTICE[24072]: chan_sip.c:15889 handle_request_register: Registration from '<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc23...

...(10.11.37.155): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.327 ms 64 bytes from domain-server2 (10.11.37.155): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.249 ms 64 bytes from domain-server2 (10.11.37.155): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.226 ms ^C --- domain-server2 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.226/0.267/0.327/0.045 ms Regards. El vie., 25 sept. 2020 a las 9:20, Rowland penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribi?: > On 25/09/2020 13:16, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > On 25/09/2020 12:55, Robert Wooden wrote: > >> Thank...

On 25/09/2020 12:55, Robert Wooden wrote: > Thanks Dr, Naumer and Rowland. > > Although still not quite correct, my pam_mount.conf.xml looks like: > root at lws4:~# cat /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml > <debug enable="1" /> > <volume fstype="fuse" > server="mbr04.subdom.example.com <http://mbr04.subdom.example.com>" >