search for: 20200901

...in the filename table ,that confuse our debugger . So we like to hear from experts here ,before we investigate the DIBuilder to fix the same. Thank you ~Umesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/edf811ef/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test.cpp Type: application/octet-stream Size: 229 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/edf811ef/attachment.obj> -----------...

...the limit comes from the read block size fixed at 256K. Could it be changed to 512K or even to 1 000K to enjoy the maximum bandwidth available? Thanks Guillaume B -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20200901/32d89d02/attachment.htm>

...t llvmbb I've heard it's easy to just "/ignore llvmbb", but if that's what everybody does then why not not have it in the first place? Nico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/055a648b/attachment.html>

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 9:07 AM Venkataramanan Kumar <venkataramanan.kumar.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alexandre, Hi Venkataramanan, > I am not sure if we can generate vector calls to GlibC libmvec. Is the support for libmvec on the roadmap? If not how to add it? > ./clang --autocomplete=-fveclib= This is amazing, thank you! I think it should be documented in clang auto

...de as mentioned earlier. I think it would make sense to add support for libmvec in a similar fashion. That should be relatively straight-forward. Cheers, Florian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/b6f9035a/attachment.html>

...__________________ >> cfe-dev mailing list >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/794ae504/attachment.html>

...man 713104 West Bengal, India Emails: daneel at utexas.edu, aroy at phys.buruniv.ac.in, hariseldon99 at gmail.com Webpage: http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~daneel/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20200901/1cd64338/attachment.htm>

...man 713104 West Bengal, India Emails: daneel at utexas.edu, aroy at phys.buruniv.ac.in, hariseldon99 at gmail.com Webpage: http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~daneel/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20200901/9bf947ab/attachment.htm>

Hi Teresa, Thank you for the help, adding the "used" attribute worked just fine. It made me realize that the memset function is never inlined by the LTO optimization even without my implementation of the "EmitTargetCodeForMemSet" method. I supposed that the passes dealing with the memset function happen too late, is that correct? Thank you again, Romaric On Fri, Aug 28, 2020

...in the filename table ,that confuse our debugger . So we like to hear from experts here ,before we investigate the DIBuilder to fix the same. Thank you ~Umesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/3dc48f73/attachment.html>

...stays the same, but LLVM will have more freedom to generate more of DW_OP_entry_values operation on the callee side. Any thoughts on this? Best regards, Djordje -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/266dde12/attachment.html>

...man 713104 West Bengal, India Emails: daneel at utexas.edu, aroy at phys.buruniv.ac.in, hariseldon99 at gmail.com Webpage: http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~daneel/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20200901/b8242d84/attachment.htm>

I've tried to do: clang++ -O3 -march=native -mtune=native \ -Rpass=loop-vectorize,slp-vectorize -Rpass-missed=loop-vectorize,slp-vectorize -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize,slp-vectorize \ -ffast-math -ffp-model=fast -ffp-exception-behavior=ignore -ffp-contract=fast \ -c -o vec.o vec.cc But I've got no feedback. -- Alexandre Bique

...; "example.com")) NIL NIL NIL "<WLXvFmpAZFNeQbPPITjRwimDyamnBm2 at test>")) This is a valid email address, and ENVELOPE reply is correct. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200901/44f4c915/attachment-0001.html>

...___________________________ > Nouveau mailing list > Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20200901/1d5d369a/attachment-0001.htm>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 1:29 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 1:24 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:16 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Would you like to conduct the conversation here, or on the review thread? (I lean

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:10 PM Florian Hahn <florian_hahn at apple.com> wrote: > The loop vectorizer does not really handle loops that already operate on vectors, so that is why the loop using v4f32 does not get widened. > > Arguably the user explicitly asked for 4xfloat vectors in the v4f32 version, so that is what gets generated. In my case I have tons of legacy code written for

Hi, Is it me, or has Phabricator changed at some point in the past week or two with regards to emails for newly created reviews? I noticed this morning that my mailing rule (which previously simply marked new emails from review at reviews.llvm.org with a specific tag) was no longer working for them, and consequently, I missed several new review requests. (It wasn't an issue for subsequent

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

We are trying to remove the io_lru handling and depend on zero init base, offset and addr here. v2: init addr as well Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644 ---