search for: 20200225

...4 Call-ID: 1001880886-0-2320154044 at 8.38.43.49 CSeq: 1 CANCEL Max-Forwards: 66 Reason: Q.850;cause=34;text="No Ring Timeout" Content-Length: 0 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200225/8bab54e4/attachment.html>

...on how to transition (https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo) and am not seeking any advice on how to do so. Tom. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/3a7aa6d9/attachment.html>

...-flto flag and gold plugin. I found that the option " -debug-pass=Structure" would not pass to ld. so it would not print all the LTO pass's name. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/f814bad3/attachment.html>

...* dovecot-lda / with sieve fileinto box > * dovecot-lda / with sieve fileinto :create box > > So, I can't reproduce any bugs related to this. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200225/ff7f1a1c/attachment.html>

...s for multiple party support. Is it possible to add more than 2 channels? If so, is there a limit? Or a way to configure the limit? Have a great day! Dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200225/71daa844/attachment.html>

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:9pt" ><div dir="ltr" >Hi all,</div> <div dir="ltr" >I'm very excited to be able to share this with everyone. </div> <div dir="ltr" > </div> <div dir="ltr" >IBM announced this

...to zorg till we finish porting everything. If you have something cooking, please talk to me to make sure your time line and ours are coordinated. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/f25dd341/attachment.html>

Hello Asterisk, I've been running a CENTOS 5 box with Asterisk 14 and am trying to move to Asterisk 17.2 on a new Fedora Server 31 box. I built Asterisk from Source as I've always done and copied all the configuration files and other stuff from the old box. Everything comes up as expected and it all seems to work except I have one way audio. I'm still using SIP, not pjsip. As soon as

...n is required as to why though. -- Kevin Harwell Software Developer Sangoma Technologies Check us out at: https://sangoma.com & https://asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200225/339d20d9/attachment.html>

...be exposed to non-legacy drivers. Not to mention that const data (drm_driver), which has (const) pointer to mutable data (legacy bits) is a trap IMHO Emil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20200225/d84d213c/attachment.htm>

Simon Matter wrote: > >> However, we would still like to know what the issue is and get a 'real' >> fix - I guess we could try creating a bug report with Redhat ... > > By bug report you mean BZ or a support request as paying RHEL customer? A BZ ... > Unfortunately I'm not too happy anymore with how BZs are handled these > days. Am I alone with this

...* dovecot-lda / with sieve fileinto box > * dovecot-lda / with sieve fileinto :create box > > So, I can't reproduce any bugs related to this. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200225/b96ae21e/attachment.html>

...e fileinto box >> * dovecot-lda / with sieve fileinto :create box >> >> So, I can't reproduce any bugs related to this. >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200225/f404877f/attachment.html>

On 25. Feb 2020, at 4.55, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have auto-subscribe turned on, but I had to doveadm mailbox subscribe to a LDA/Sieve created mailbox today. > > Did something break? I added a bunch of tests for lda_mailbox_autocreate and lda_mailbox_autosubscribe and they seem to work fine: * dovecot-lda -m box / without sieve * dovecot-lda -m

...ing it in the logs and then seeing the field empty in the db doesn't make sense to me. Any tips on where/how I can troubleshoot this? Thanks, Joel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200225/ad6fdbaf/attachment.html>

Hi! I've started looking porting our application which uses LLVM JIT to using LLVM 9 (9.0.1). To begin, I tried running the HowToUseJIT.cpp (example directory) program and it fails with a segfault: ./HowToUseJIT We just constructed this LLVM module: ; ModuleID = 'test' source_filename = "test" Running foo: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Running it through GDB:

Hey Xen devel team, I’ve never mailed a developer list before, but I’m worried I may have stumbled across a bad Xen/Debian packaging bug. My confidence is somewhere above “just mail -user” and below “open a bug in xen-system-amd64”. Apologies if this is the wrong usage of the list. I’ve updated to Buster, and my Xen kernel no longer boots. I believe it’s because Xen only offers versions 4.11 and

...//issues.asterisk.org/ Thanks! -- Kevin Harwell Software Developer Sangoma Technologies Check us out at: https://sangoma.com & https://asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200225/eb20b610/attachment.html>

Hello, I'd like to help improve the debug experience in LLVM/Clang when optimizations are enabled, but I'm not sure where to start. I've seen the umbrella bug for poor debug experiences (38768 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38768 ). Is there any bug in this list that isn't being looked at (and that doesn't require a lot of knowledge) that I could work on? I also tried

> > Should we just make it a normal target? > My only remaining reservation here - the generic DebugInfo tests, which presumably due to an unimplemented 16-bit branch somewhere deep in the llvm-objdump callstack. The AVR backend passes virtually all of the LLVM test suite but these when avr-unknown-unknown is set as the default target. It feels like the inclusion of ~80 XFAILs for these