search for: 201ms

...t qualify: 198 [Dec 7 03:36:22] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now Reachable. (199ms / 2000ms) [Dec 7 04:36:38] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 177 [Dec 7 05:36:05] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now Reachable. (201ms / 2000ms) [Dec 7 06:36:21] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 156 [Dec 7 07:36:02] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now Reachable. (177ms / 2000ms) [Dec 7 08:36:19] NOTICE[19226] chan_sip.c: Peer '108' is now UNREACHABLE! La...

...rrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP pre-glapi 8G 196245 30 105331 15 962775 49 1638 34 Latency 1578ms 1383ms 201ms 301ms Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP pre-glapi 8G 155937 27 102899...

It worries me how many threads talk about low performance. I'm about to build out a replica 3 setup and run Ovirt with a bunch of Windows VMs. Are the issues Tony is experiencing "normal" for Gluster? Does anyone here have a system with windows VMs and have good performance? *Vincent Royer* *778-825-1057* <http://www.epicenergy.ca/> *SUSTAINABLE MOBILE ENERGY SOLUTIONS*

On 01/05/2018 02:27, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > So is the KVM or Vmware as the host(s)?? I basically have the same setup > ie 3 x 1TB "raid1" nodes and VMs, but 1gb networking.? I do notice with > vmware using NFS disk was pretty slow (40% of a single disk) but this > was over 1gb networking which was clearly saturating.? Hence I am moving > to KVM to use glusterfs