search for: 20190626

...atleast dump a warning. I am attaching a sample input file on which loop vectorizer generates incorrect code. run with : opt -loop-vectorize Thanks, Rajasekhar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/90e7f0d2/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: r0.ll Type: application/octet-stream Size: 46230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/90e7f0d2/attachment-0001.obj>

...rted in https://developer.blender.org/T66159 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20190626/cc3ddb5b/attachment-0001.html>

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 13:22, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > The only way I can think of to reliably detect the direction is using > an __attribute__((noinline)) function to compare locals from two > different, nested frames (even that's iffy though on a semantic > level). If there turned out to be a compelling enough use-case, an > intrinsic could be

On Jun 26, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 6/24/19 6:23 PM, Siva Chandra via llvm-dev wrote: >> Within Google, we have a growing range of needs that existing libc >> implementations don't quite address. >> To be very clear: we don't expect our needs to exactly match everyone >> else's -- part of our

...pattern match Initial Opcode index to 0 Match failed at index 0 LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t11: i32 = FrameIndex<2> > Cheers. > > Tim. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/f2213f95/attachment.html>

...nic systems or information. It is your responsibility to maintain virus detection systems to prevent damage to your electronic systems and information. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20190626/b2b6a1ae/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13506 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20190626/b2b6a1ae/attachment-0002.png>...

...lopers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > > > -- > 宋方睿 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/cbdf0f18/attachment.html>

> Does anyone actually use the default to a.out behavior? This is a good point. What bugs me is continuity across the tools, I agree with you that it isn't particularly useful to default to a.out. But we are kind of stuck with the weird way that GNU's binutils do things. I am not in favor of llvm-objdump defaulting to a.out, but llvm-readelf giving this warning message. My guess is that

Em 24/06/2019 18:39, Jorge Bastos via dovecot escreveu: > Hi Julio, > > Could you share with us your "acl" config for shared folder? > May be interesting for me, > > Jorge, Hi Jorge. Currently I'm not using the shared folder. Maybe you could be interested in this tutorial from iRedmail: https://docs.iredmail.org/public.folder.html

...-mail are confidential. If you are not theintended recipient you are to delete this e-mail immediately, disregardits contents and disclose them to no other persons. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190626/592edae5/attachment.html>

...PT_ARG_VAL, &append_mode, 2, 0, 0 }, Thanks, Jan-Benedict -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20190626/9f637af1/signature.sig>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172 Bug ID: 1172 Summary: chain priority cannot be set by a defined variable Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

...on. Can you, please, advise me how to implement that? See for example > lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:2916. > > Cheers. > > Tim. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/0b6684d8/attachment.html>

...________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190626/61ec71d6/attachment.html>

I’m not totally sold on the idea of having it be a layer between system libc and application. I think this is likely to create a split between windows and non windows that will be difficult to overcome. It also seems like it brings with it its own set of difficulties. Where can you make a separation in libc such that you’re guaranteed that the two pieces do not share any state, especially given

I’ve been experimenting with SEH handling in LLVM, and it seems like the unwind funclets generated by LLVM are much larger than those generated by Microsoft’s CL compiler. I used the following code as a test: void test() { MyClass x; externalFunction(); } Compiling with CL, the unwind funclet that destroys ‘x’ is just two lines of asm: lea rcx, QWORD PTR x$[rdx] jmp ??1MyClass@@QEAA at XZ

...t;" mailbox INBOX from testeteste at bbbb.com doveadm import -u teste at xxx.com mdbox:/var/backup/teste at aaaaa.com/ "" all Thanks a Lot Alexander -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190626/73771e42/attachment-0001.html>

Greetings, I use Icecast for the live airing of my open phones podcast, and we've recently had some trouble with malicious actors attempting to disrupt the production in various ways, most of which are beyond the scope of this inquiry. Today the Icecast feed kept disconnecting and resetting the listener count. This happens on rare occasions, and I usually accept this as a noisy neighbor

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 12:16, Gleb Popov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > 1. Where does it come from? Can I do anything to make it not appear? > > It comes from something like: > > %ptr = alloca i8 > %var = alloca i8* > store i8* %ptr, i8**

...l are confidential. If you are not theintended recipient you are to delete this e-mail immediately, disregardits contents and disclose them to no other persons. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190626/168268b6/attachment.html>