Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "201841".
Did you mean:
20184
2016 Sep 06
2
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
...hput, traffic is split up between
>> two
>> interface half by half.
>>
>
> This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the
> following reply for a thread on similar subject for more details.
>
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/201841.html
[...]AFAIK, the windows client only puts traffic on interfaces of same
speed and quality simultaneouslt[...]
I interpret this as "with two identical NIC-speeds at server-side and
client-side it should result in double throughput".
On both hosts I've 2x1GBit/s NICs and Windows...
2016 Sep 04
2
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
Hello,
I'm running Samba 4.4.5 with enabled SMB Multichannel. The Linux server
has two 1GBit/s NICs and for testing purposes I've shared a tmpfs
mountpoint with 2GiB and ~2GiB large test-file.
My Windows 10 host has one dual-port 1GBit/s NIC, and if both interfaces
are enabled, Get-SmbMultichannelConnection lists active multichannel
connections to my Linux SMB server.
If I disable one
2016 Sep 06
0
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
...gt; So instead of doubling the throughput, traffic is split up between
> two
> interface half by half.
>
This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the
following reply for a thread on similar subject for more details.
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/201841.html
> Is it possible to change this behaviour?
>
>
> Hardware infos on Linux:
>
> 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
> Connection (rev 03)
> 08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
> Connection (rev 03)
&g...
2016 Sep 06
0
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
...n
> >>two
> >>interface half by half.
> >>
> >
> >This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the
> >following reply for a thread on similar subject for more details.
> >
> >https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/201841.html
>
>
> [...]AFAIK, the windows client only puts traffic on interfaces of same
> speed and quality simultaneouslt[...]
>
> I interpret this as "with two identical NIC-speeds at server-side
> and client-side it should result in double throughput".
> On both ho...
2016 Sep 06
2
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
...t;>> interface half by half.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is mostly a Windows client-controlled behavior. Refer to the
>>> following reply for a thread on similar subject for more details.
>>>
>>> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/201841.html
>>
>>
>> [...]AFAIK, the windows client only puts traffic on interfaces of same
>> speed and quality simultaneouslt[...]
>>
>> I interpret this as "with two identical NIC-speeds at server-side
>> and client-side it should result in double throughp...
2014 Mar 26
19
[LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans
Hi,
We are now about halfway between the 3.4 and 3.5 releases, and I would
like to start preparing for a 3.4.1 release. Here is my proposed release
schedule:
Mar 26 - April 9: Identify and backport additional bug fixes to the 3.4 branch.
April 9 - April 18: Testing Phase
April 18: 3.4.1 Release
How you can help:
- If you have any bug fixes you think should be included to 3.4.1, send
me an