search for: 201806l

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "201806l".

2020 Apr 03
6
[RFC] Improving FileCheck
...ke" [7]. An open question here from jdenny is whether it makes sense to require all checks to follow that pattern (with the colon, of course) to make things less user-hostile [8]: > Consider this example that has a well formed directive that doesn't follow the rule: > > // FIXME(201806L) CHECK: assert: 0 > Approach A (from a previous comment): FileCheck executes the directive. If the user later accidentally removes the :, FileCheck won't execute the directive and won't diagnose the error unless the user is wiling to endure false positives by opting into the more verbose...