search for: 20170509

....org/#/c/16279/5 please let me know what is the plan of community to provide the solution of this problem and in which version. Regards Abhishek Paliwal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170509/79a8de26/attachment.html>

On 9 May 2017 at 18:55, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > Does anyone see good reasons why libFuzzer should remain in llvm repo >> > (as >> > opposed to moving it to compiler-rt)? >> >> Does moving LibFuzzer to compiler-rt imply that it

...art of compiler-rt > I presumed we would need to supply both libraries to end users. > Given that this feature was removed it is a non-issue. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170509/f5944eae/attachment.html>

...ompiler-rt >>> I presumed we would need to supply both libraries to end users. >>> Given that this feature was removed it is a non-issue. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170509/6afc8d3e/attachment.html>

Where did getBacktrace go? I cant find any changes about it except for it simply disappearing after I updated from 3.8 to 4.0... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170508/6ca7bce9/attachment.html>

...*Intelligent Systems and Applications Laboratory Faculty of Sciences and TechnologiesSidi Mohamed Ben AbdellahUniversity P.B​: 2202, Imouzzer road, Fez.​Morocco.* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170509/86672a1f/attachment.html>

> Does anyone see good reasons why libFuzzer should remain in llvm repo (as > opposed to moving it to compiler-rt)? Does moving LibFuzzer to compiler-rt imply that it is compiled as part of compiler-rt and shipped with it? How does that fit with LibFuzzer's model of allowing the user to provide their own `main()`. Would you just build two different libraries. One with a `main()` and

...uild cache and reconfiguring it all together. Ideally the script would re-configure CMake every time it runs to prevent this sort of problem in the future. /Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170509/0fd05489/attachment.html>

Hi Piotr, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > Also, Sanjoy proposed to mark invariant.group features as experimental, so > we will not be afraid to break behavior of frontends that already use it. > > Right now I am pretty sure that clang is the only one that curently uses it > (and not by default). Firstly, yes, I think we

https://source.android.com/source/using-repo It plays well with large projects (heck, it was designed for Android), and it works really well. I'm guessing you guys have already considered it and rejecting it for some really smart reason, but I wanted to make sure! ;) -- Ryan (ライアン) Yoko Shimomura > ryo (supercell/EGOIST) > Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone else http://refi64.com/

..., what is incorrect, why there is a difference? Yours faithfully Czarek Kowalski -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: truncatedT.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 197913 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20170509/a18ff86a/attachment.pdf>

...ith ELFv2 ABI so far. I truly appreciate any advices and comments. Best regards, Hiroshi ----- Hiroshi Inoue <inouehrs at jp.ibm.com> IBM Research - Tokyo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170509/1d58d531/attachment-0001.html>

> Isn't Instruction* a pointer to the instruction in memory? If so, it'll change across runs Correct, but none of this is meant to be stored across runs, so the actual address doesn't matter. You recompute the map every time your IR is loaded. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 8 May 2017 at

On 9 May 2017, at 16:59, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if you really read the last sentence of what I wrote, or if you followed the previous discussions on the plan here? > At this point I believe that this concern is non-existent per the read-only individual repo. The read-only repo is only useful if you don’t intend to contribute stuff back

...eau mailing list > >> Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20170509/7f0deacb/attachment-0001.html>

On 9 May 2017, at 15:58, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd expect any CI system to be able to cache this. > Also if you're issue is archiving a lot of build artifacts, the constant cost of the checkout isn't gonna matter that much. > Finally, the read-only individual repo can still be used by CI, which address this entirely. If we want to pull in new

getProcessTriple just determines operation system, and architecture. It doesn't deal with specific instruction set features. The CPU should be controlled by MCPU on the EngineBuilder i think. The CPU autodetection code lives in getHostCPUName in lib/Support/Host.cpp, but I don't think the JIT calls into. I think its expected the user would call it or pass a specific CPU string to the MCPU

Hello I have the following scenario: [mynicecontext] exten => 2000,1,Dial(SIP/deviceA&SIP/deviceB&SIP/deviceC) As expected, by dialing 2000, all three devices will ring. And that's fine. However, there are situations where I only want "deviceA" and "deviceB" to ring. I would like to have an extension to dial in order to modify the dialplan. Here is what I

On 8 May 2017, at 20:51, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2017-05-07 1:01 GMT-07:00 David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Is this intended to be the monorepo that eventually becomes the official repo, because if so I strongly object to putting libunwind, libc++ and libc++abi in it. I have recently been working on bring-up for libc++

I am writing an analysis pass on LLVM which requires to: [1] generate unique, positive ID corresponding to each instruction [2] the ID must survive across runs [3] given the ID, corresponding instruction has to be mapped back For [1], the general suggestion is to use the Value* instr_ptr associated to each instruction. The instr_ptr points to specific instruction in memory, hence