search for: 20160810

...; icesupport=yes" ?? This is no answer to my question. So again : what am I missing to get ICE support on my Asterisk 11.23.0 ?? Kind regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160810/eb12407f/attachment.html>

Hi Is there any configuration change in asterisk 13.9.1 to show original callerid on a transfer In asterisk 11.21 it works as expected Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160810/7e14a4e0/attachment.html>

Dear! I know you were looking for this, I found this stuff for you, take a look at <http://above.preparedness.net/e4hqic> roland.leurs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20160810/daaa4f35/attachment-0007.html>

...cdca29f44508914a0f5f5d5 This will show up with upcoming nft 0.7 release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160810/74ce362f/attachment.html>

...ave a couple of patches I'd like to send you but I can't find details about the submission process. Can you help me? Thanks Dario. -- Naima is online. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20160810/d838ed31/attachment.html>

...able to run llvm test-suite without LNT? Also, is there any example of configuring test-suite to run against 3rd party backend rather than llc? Thanks Hongbin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160810/2adbad76/attachment.html>

Ajay Ramjatan asks if it would be ok to have: A config file that contains list of DSA/RSA/ED25519 entries to be added, when run by default. Currently According to the man page: " Alternative file names can be given on the command line. If any file requires a passphrase, ssh-add asks for the passphrase from the user. " Instead of specifying each key file, a single file such as .config

Hello I'm trying for several days now to get ICE support for my Asterisk 11.23 on CentOS 6. My call setup : sipml5_webRTC (nat) --> public Asterisk on 178.18.90.230 --> softphone Zoiper (problem : no audio) Reverse does not work either. (problem : failed get local SDP) I followed this guide : https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/WebRTC+tutorial+using+SIPML5

...mining-and-setting-host-target-triple-and-instruction-extensions-in-llvm-c/38801586 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: avx-instruction-selection.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 3509 bytes Desc: URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160810/b5275152/attachment.c>

Oops. That's -T. From the man page, it doesn't really look like there's an ssh_config option for -N. -----Original Message----- From: openssh-unix-dev [mailto:openssh-unix-dev-bounces+scott_n=xypro.com at mindrot.org] On Behalf Of Scott Neugroschl Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:04 PM To: Volker Diels-Grabsch; openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: RE: Equivalent ssh_config

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Kevin Choi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > -Wl,--plugin=LLVMgold.so,--plugin-opt=emit-llvm This is totally Gold specific. The fact that he mentions using LTOCodeGenerator makes me think that he does not use Gold. > > http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/opt.html <http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/opt.html> >

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-08-09 at 11:58 -0300, francis picabia via samba wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:37:13 -0300 > > > francis picabia <fpicabia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >

...uot; Dear! I know you were looking for this, I found this stuff for you, take a look at <http://above.preparedness.net/e4hqic> roland.leurs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20160810/daaa4f35/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:23:29 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Fw: i found the stuff Message-ID: <422258c2-1632-a55a-97e4-6c0fbd6...

...--Enjoy The Samba Team -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-announce/attachments/20160810/30227f44/signature.sig>

...--Enjoy The Samba Team -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-announce/attachments/20160810/30227f44/signature.sig>

Thanks Ayal! I'll take a look at DENBench. As another data point - I tried enabling this on our internal benchmarks. I'm seeing one regression, and it seems to be a regression of the "good" kind - without interleaving we don't vectorize the innermost loop, and with interleaving we do. The vectorized loop is actually significantly faster when benchmarked in isolation, but in

...terisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160810/47ad1bed/attachment.html>

Dear testers, 3.9.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r277207. This took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I think the branch is in a decent state now. There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the real testing started to see where we're at. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how it goes. I'll upload source, docs,

Hi Duncan, > […] > 2. Those working on projects *outside* the monolithic repo will get the downsides of both: a monolithic repo that they are only using parts of, and multiple repos that are somehow version-locked. > > 3. For many (most?) developers, changing to a monolithic git repo is a *bigger* workflow change than switching to separate git repos. Many people (and at least some