search for: 20160528

...X[1608]: failed to idle channel 6 [X[1608]] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20160528/9a94a951/attachment.html>

....start: 740160 looks suspicious. As you suggest to test it on batt, I'm unsure what to do now - get it replaced or exchange to IMPERIAL series. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20160528/6246499c/attachment.html>

...ble to have RegMask at fixed position in Operands array in MI? Also provide some more details on updating cached RegMask in various other class. Sincerely, Vivek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160528/de9febf1/attachment.html>

...lk all the operands till you find one which > "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. > > Ok. -Vivek > -- > Mehdi > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160528/60d892f4/attachment.html>

> On May 27, 2016, at 11:49 AM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Mentors, > > I have completed writing simple register mask calculator pass, an immutable pass that stores RegMasks and provides API to query them, and a target specific pass for X86 target which currently iterates through all MI in given MF and if a call instruction is found then it

On 27 May 2016 at 21:26, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Done. r271095 Thanks that fixed the issue for me. But now ``fuzzer.test`` is failing for me. Specifically ``` not LLVMFuzzer-NullDerefTest -close_fd_mask=3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NullDerefTest ``` However it looks like this is to be expected because this test is relying on the symbol

...alue: 0 --Larry -- Larry Fahnoe, Fahnoe Technology Consulting, fahnoe at FahnoeTech.com Minneapolis, Minnesota www.FahnoeTech.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20160528/7982a943/attachment-0001.html>

...????????? ????????????????????????Secvrstr at foxmail.com ??? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ????? ????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20160528/89ef3268/attachment.html>

...ve many GUAs available, I thought I should go for ULAs then. Niklaas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20160528/1fe1cb41/attachment.sig>

...go for ULAs for flexibility. Anyway, it's working. :-) Niklaas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20160528/b6e238a5/attachment.sig>

...ice if there where a performant ipfx,netflow or sflow solution on linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160528/6a552312/attachment.html>

...es giving an error) is to decode with the provided downmixing mixing matrix. Are you suggesting we exclude the stereo downmixing matrix? -- Thanks, Michael Graczyk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20160528/ff8678fb/attachment.html>

Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2016, at 6:55 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:23 AM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On May 27, 2016, at 11:49

Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2016, at 7:02 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: >> >>> On May 27, 2016, at 6:55 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On

...MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? -Vivek > -Vivek > >> -- >> Mehdi >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160528/0050a5ec/attachment.html>

...____________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160528/280753eb/attachment.html>

Done. r271095 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Reproduced, should be easy to fix. Will do it. > And thanks for noticing, on my machine this fails very fast and the test > passes because it sees everything it wants to see. > > --kcc > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >

....cpp file of your pass). > > But Operands are private to MI so It should go into MI or some other tricks like Friend Function ? Vivek > - Matthias > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160528/9118084f/attachment-0001.html>

Hello. Not listed as supported, so here is some info, [root at vhost ~]# /usr/sbin/usbhid-ups -DD -a powercom Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.38 (2.7.2) USB communication driver 0.32 0.000000 debug level is '2' 0.001318 upsdrv_initups... 0.074753 Checking device (0529/0001) (003/002) 0.074835 Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)

static void setXXX(MachineInstr &MI, ...) { for (MachineOperand &MO : MI.operands()) { if (MO.isRegMask()) MO.setRegMask(...); } } > On May 27, 2016, at 7:02 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de <mailto:matze at braunis.de>> wrote: >