search for: 20160028806

I did a quick google to see what Haolo Replication was - nice feature, very useful. Unfortunately I also found this: https://www.google.com/patents/US20160028806 >Halo based file system replication >US 20160028806 A1 Is this an issue? On 25 August 2017 at 10:33, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > 3 weeks back we (most of the maintainers of Gluster projects) had a > meeting, and we discussed a...

Hello Everyone, 3 weeks back we (most of the maintainers of Gluster projects) had a meeting, and we discussed about features required for Gluster 4.0 and also the possible dates. <https://hackmd.io/GwIwnGBmCsCM0FoDMsAcBTBAWADLLCYATLJiOmBVgMYAmAhvbLUA#summary> Summary: - It is agreed unanimously that the Gluster 4.0 should be feature based release, and not just time based. -

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:21:08PM +1000, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > > > This feature (and the patent) is from facebook folks. > > > > > Does that mean its not a problem? Facebook contributed the patches for this feature, so I don't think there is a problem. Niels (not a lawyer)

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 at 06:11, Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > I did a quick google to see what Haolo Replication was - nice feature, > very useful. > > Unfortunately I also found this: > https://www.google.com/patents/US20160028806 > > >Halo based file system replication > >US 20160028806 A1 > This feature (and the patent) is from facebook folks. > > > Is this an issue? > > > > > > On 25 August 2017 at 10:33, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hell...