search for: 20150805

...Vol 143, Issue 7> ? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??????. -------------------------------------------- ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????. -------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20150805/45bf992d/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: klibc-request at zytor.com Subject: klibc Digest, Vol 143, Issue 7 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:00:01 -0700 Size: 3638 URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20150805/45bf9...

...ith some auth Variables and > caching? > > > Greetz Matze > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x7BCC653A.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3116 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150805/f61c7c09/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150805/f61c7c09/attachment.sig&gt...

Hi list, I have a question on auth caching in 2.2.18. I am using acl_groups for a master user, appended in a static userdb file # snip ############################### master at uma:{SHA}XXXX=::::::userdb_acl_groups=umareadmaster allow_nets=127.0.0.1 # snap ############################### and use this group in a global ACL file. I discovered this only works on first NOT-cached login

...only have 1s and 0s output? Also, what target architecture is being used for the estimations? (Is it auto detecting the architecture I'm on?) Thanks, Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150805/ebffcedc/attachment-0001.html>

...m really new one to llvm and particularly lit, and maybe don't understand all the underneath problems of the suggestions above. Best regards, Andrei Serebro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150805/dc8a1ba3/attachment.html>

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 07:06 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > CentOS Linux normally also follows the upstream dist tags, except for > packages where we make changes, where we use .el6.centos on those to > denote we have modified them. I thought, mistakenly perhaps, that Centos = RHEL without the RHEL branding. Why would Centos modify a RHEL package before offering the package to its

...e to meet the trademark/branding requirements as the goal. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150805/4fa96f54/attachment-0001.sig>

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 15:12 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/04/2015 02:40 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > I thought, mistakenly perhaps, that Centos = RHEL without the RHEL > > branding. > > > > Why would Centos modify a RHEL package before offering the package to > > its devoted and appreciative Centos users ? > To remove the RHEL branding? No. Johnny

Hi, The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing mediums. Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs ==AIM== Initial Idea : http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#docs-toolchain The CentOS Project needs more short-form

...code .. but it is NOT even close to being a CLONE of RHEL. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150805/7d277bf0/attachment-0001.sig>

....Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5691 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150805/c103c7d3/attachment.bin>

Hi, The bug originated when one of our tests failed with an answer-mismatch on Mac, after upgrading to XCode 6.2. The internal IR after all our transforms, and just before it hits the final LLVM lowering is identical on Mac and Linux: var t6 : int8_T{col}[10] = {34, -48, 18, -12, 33, 0, 21, -7, -20, -31}; The LLVM lowering itself doesn't try to do anything smart. When we dumpModule, we

On 2015-08-04 at 19:27 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:11:56AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > > We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based > > containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. > > The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: > > >

Hi all, Strange request, I have a customer where we are putting an Asterisk PBX in front of a legacy (non-VoIP) PBX. One of the requirements it that the Asterisk PBX have 2 PRI ports (on towards the legacy PBX and one towards the carrier) with the ability to go to pass through should the Asterisk PBX (software or hardware level) fail. I did not see this feature in the Digium, Sangoma, Allo, or

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59069 Priority: medium Bug ID: 59069 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau E[ DRM] fail ttm_validate QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: kees.bakker at xs4all.nl

TLDR - The proposal below is intended to allow inlining of larger callees when such inlining is expected to reduce the dynamic instructions count. Proposal ------------- LLVM inlines a function if the size growth (in the given context) is less than a threshold. The threshold is increased based on certain characteristics of the called function (inline keyword and the fraction of vector

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:58:02 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops > with a volatile iteration variable > ----- Original Message ----- > >