search for: 2014oct

...or > ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to > stuff too many things into the 6.04 release but hold them for 6.05. > </quote> > > > Wishful thinking gets you nowhere. > :) I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Since 2014Oct, no actual effort has been made to solve / improve that 64-bit support for ext4 in Syslinux, and the "very high" priority was changed later to "maybe some day someone with the necessary skills and knowledge would care enough and do something about it". The development pace w...

On 03.07.2015 08:28, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > Maybe we should rather wait? ... > FWIW, I am still against releasing 6.04-pre1 yet. > > Regards, > Ady. > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-October/022689.html <quote> I would like to do a short cycle for 6.04, because 64-bit support for ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to

I'm starting this thread to discuss what git repository should be designated as primary and which repositories should be designated as secondary. For years, git.kernel.org has been the primary repo, updated at least with every full and pre- release. git.zytor.com has been the secondary and development repo. Additionally, I've maintained my repos at github.com and git.zytor.com as

...; > -- > > -Gene > > I don't know about primary / secondary / unofficial, but I would like > to mention some points for consideration. > > 1_ repo.or.cz currently uses a web interface similar to the > gitweb-caching interface that was used in git.zytor.com until 2014Oct. > This might not be very important for developers, but it might be > relevant for others (myself included). > > 2_ repo.or.cz is already being used by NASM, and by some contributors. > > 3_ github.com has the possibility of "wiki" and "issues". This sounds...

...ich I expect to stay this way. > > -- > -Gene I don't know about primary / secondary / unofficial, but I would like to mention some points for consideration. 1_ repo.or.cz currently uses a web interface similar to the gitweb-caching interface that was used in git.zytor.com until 2014Oct. This might not be very important for developers, but it might be relevant for others (myself included). 2_ repo.or.cz is already being used by NASM, and by some contributors. 3_ github.com has the possibility of "wiki" and "issues". This sounds as a potential advantage, bu...

...; -Gene >> >> I don't know about primary / secondary / unofficial, but I would like >> to mention some points for consideration. >> >> 1_ repo.or.cz currently uses a web interface similar to the >> gitweb-caching interface that was used in git.zytor.com until 2014Oct. >> This might not be very important for developers, but it might be >> relevant for others (myself included). >> >> 2_ repo.or.cz is already being used by NASM, and by some contributors. This is the reason I'd consider this the best candidate as the new primary. >&...