search for: 2014feb13

> Syslinux depended on too many bleeding edge commits of gnu-efi to > make it viable. That _seems_ to be no longer accurate. The official 6.03 release (2014Oct06) was built based on the gnu-efi commit: ab54e2b40e914d0ca01dc3d44c8d4eb8517bf999 from 2014Feb13. At the time Syslinux 6.03 was released, the build was no longer using a "bleeding edge" commit of gnu-efi (it was several months old and dozens of commits old). By the time I am writing this email, the Syslinux source code is still pointing to the same "old" commit and there...

On Nov 25, 2014 12:30 AM, "Anatol Pomozov" <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com> wrote: > While we discuss gnu-efi. How difficult to make it using system-wide > installed library instead of checking out and building it? Some > systems already have gnu-efi packaged/installed. It makes sense to use > it. The first attempt was to do exactly that however Syslinux depended on too

...December 22, 2014, 9:29 AM > Syslinux depended on too many bleeding edge commits of gnu-efi to > make it viable. That _seems_ to be no longer accurate. The official 6.03 release (2014Oct06) was built based on the gnu-efi commit: ab54e2b40e914d0ca01dc3d44c8d4eb8517bf999 from 2014Feb13. At the time Syslinux 6.03 was released, the build was no longer using a "bleeding edge" commit of gnu-efi (it was several months old and dozens of commits old). By the time I am writing this email, the Syslinux source code is still pointing to the same "old" commit...