search for: 20140402

Hi Guys, Where are the pre-built binaries of LLVM 3.4 for Mac OS X? This is the first release I've seen of LLVM that doesn't include a download link via the downloads page for a Mac OS X binary. Can someone please put it up? Thanks. -Jared -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So is for PE32 and PE32+. They cannot be mixed because they are for x86 and x86-64, respectively. I'd think we can simply wait for all files to be parsed and pass them to a LinkingContext to ask whether or not the input file set seems OK. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 4/1/2014 11:51 PM, Simon Atanasyan wrote: > >>

Hi, In file X86DisassemblerDecoder.c, we have function readPrefixes() with below code: ..... } else if (insn->mode == MODE_32BIT) { insn->registerSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); insn->addressSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->displacementSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->immediateSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); } .... This is confused to me: so we

hi,all each port of bridge, has its packets process function called br_handle_frame. i want to know before this function called who and how it get the packets? if it is a real physical ethernet, it must be its driver, but for virtual ethernet , what is the driver? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hi,all each port of bridge, has its packets process function called br_handle_frame. i want to know before this function called who and how it get the packets? if it is a real physical ethernet, it must be its driver, but for virtual ethernet , what is the driver? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hi,all each port of bridge, has its packets process function called br_handle_frame. i want to know before this function called who and how it get the packets? if it is a real physical ethernet, it must be its driver, but for virtual ethernet , what is the driver? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

If I have Asterisk setup with local SIP phones configured but need to call a SIP phone which is not local but actually on another VLAN, what would the dialplan need to look like? ? Could the Asterisk dialplan directly call a SIP phone which is not a local phone within its sip.conf and dialplan, if the Directory Number and IP is known (or host name)? ? Didn't plan on needing a SIP trunk so

On 4/2/2014 12:23 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Apr 1, 2014, at 9:19 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > >> Hi Nick, Bigcheese, >> >> When lld is used to link C++ code, it would be required to demangle symbol names by default/user driven option. >> >> The Gnu linker has the following options :- >> >> --demangle=[style] >> --no-demangle >>

Today, an enthusiastic 10 year old boy asked me about Linux. I thought of telling me to go to centos.org but then realised there is nothing on centos.org for complete beginners to Linux or for children. If anyone has the time, energy and interest, perhaps a basic technical introduction to the Centos version of Linux would be a good long-term objective. Let's catch the children's

Dear all, I'm not used to handling software raid. I've inherited a server which has raid 10 set. one of our disks failed, and it's to be replaced today. My question is; any hint how to add this new disk to the existing raid array ? first thought is :- Create identical partitions as other disks in the array i'd like to add it to.- add it to raid. Though i'm extremely worried of

How can I remove this file? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28707 Mar 31 12:31 --backup=numbered I've tried a few different methods, but most attempts interprets the file name as a switch (which it doesn't understand). TIA, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology | American Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649

I looked at this briefly, I think it causes some mistakes that get reversed later in fixupReg. The disassembler design is a bit of a mess with regards to prefixes and operand size. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>

Hi, I got lots of "undefined reference" when building vmkit. Anyone can help to give a solution? I download vmkit with "svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk/", followed the instructions of "http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk/README.TXT", and built vmkit on ubuntu 13.10 x64 with sunjava 1.6.0_45 + llvm 3.3 + classpath 0.99 + gcc 4.8.1.

Hello, i'm using centos 6.5. It was running fine for months. 2-3 days ago I updated the system incl. kernel, but now the system is restarting once a day caused by a panic. -- <1>BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000004d000001 <1>IP: [<ffffffff810657f3>] load_balance_fair+0x2a3/0x300 <4>PGD 0 <4>Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP <4>last sysfs file:

...Pages/LiebertPowerSurePSILineInteractiveUPS10003000VA.aspx I'm not a BSD expert, so please ask me for any information you need. regards Daniele -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20140402/d8a997d8/attachment.html>

On 28 March 2014 11:16, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Just the reserved part. Ok, in that case, I share you concerns. We could easily only implement the reserved ones (stack pointer being the case in hand). If there is any mad reason why allocatable ones should be used (I heard glibc uses R8 for some special things, haven't confirmed myself), we can discuss

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54:07PM -0700, Tom Roeder wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > >> The way I've implemented it (see the patch I sent to llvm-commits > >> yesterday), it's not just metadata: the intrinsic lowers to the > >> jumptable entry code given above. The CFI pass then generates a

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76732 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76732 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Kworker using 100% CPU QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: patrick.clara at gmail.com

It does sound like Android is better suited for "honest" cross-compilation, rather than "build compiler-rt for all targets we can find" model. I'm still not convinced that we must require the "ninja install" step. Could we just "ninja clang" and then build the second stage against the first stage build directory? Will this "find_package" thing

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76818 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76818 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Xorg EQ overflowing lock up QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: max.snow at 4mation.com.au