search for: 2013_07_01_archive

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "2013_07_01_archive".

2014 Jan 21
4
[LLVMdev] MCJIT versus getLazyBitcodeModule?
...patibility, but rather it's a known artifact of the MCJIT design. > > You can find an example of MCJIT's object caching here: http://blog.llvm.org/2013/08/object-caching-with-kaleidoscope.html > > The two blog entries before that may also be of use to you: http://blog.llvm.org/2013_07_01_archive.html > > I don't where you can find an example of the Module linking I described, but I think llvm::Linker is the class to look at. > > -Andy > -- Larry Gritz lg at larrygritz.com
2014 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] MCJIT versus getLazyBitcodeModule?
This is sounding rather like getLazyBitcodeModule is simply incompatible with MCJIT. Can anybody confirm that this is definitely the case? Is it by design, or by omission, or bug? Re your option #1 and #2 -- sorry for the newbie questions, but can you point me to docs or code examples for how the linking or object caching should be achieved? If I do either of these rather than seeding my
2014 Jan 26
2
[LLVMdev] MCJIT versus getLazyBitcodeModule?
...> of the MCJIT design. > >> > >> You can find an example of MCJIT's object caching here: > http://blog.llvm.org/2013/08/object-caching-with-kaleidoscope.html > >> > >> The two blog entries before that may also be of use to you: > http://blog.llvm.org/2013_07_01_archive.html > >> > >> I don't where you can find an example of the Module linking I > described, but I think llvm::Linker is the class to look at. > >> > >> -Andy > >> > > > > -- > > Larry Gritz > > lg at larrygritz.com > >...