search for: 20131028

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 58 matches for "20131028".

Did you mean: 20131023
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] .align 0
...cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/7ef9179b/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
2
how to Build .opus file
...x > > library, > > Can you explain this in some more detail? opus-tools makes no use of > the speex library. > > What messages are you getting? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20131028/0b4a89f0/attachment-0001.htm
2013 Oct 28
1
Problem with Caller ID when receiving hidden number in via DAHDI and redirecting out via SIP
...quot;Anonymous" <sip:anonymous at anonymous.invalid> Does anyone know why this is happening, is there a way to go around it? Regards, Henrik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131028/6270889b/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] .align 0
I have several assembly files in a testsuite that use, ".align 0". I found a reference to, ".align 0" in ARM's elf.h that says .align 0 is redundant and gas treats this as align 2. Should the llvm-mc follow this convention? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
2013 Oct 28
2
how to Build .opus file
...how to create the complete opus file I do not find any information about creating the header and how to store the opus packets that i encode and decode Grettings Toni -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20131028/284e7843/attachment.htm
2013 Oct 28
2
how to Build .opus file
..._________________________________________ > > opus mailing list > > opus at xiph.org > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20131028/2b15e39f/attachment.htm
2013 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
..." churn > over more time. I think this is a lost cause, and ultimately a (relatively) unimportant one. We have great tools to cope with this as well. ;] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/60f558d6/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...e time to actually interject if there are potentially fatal > issues. Forcing a dependency on gnu runtime/libs/STL is a serious > regression imho. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/102440bc/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 27
7
[Bug 70927] New: nv50_instobj_wr32 kernel panic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70927 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70927 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nv50_instobj_wr32 kernel panic Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: antoniovazquezblanco at gmail.com Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
2013 Oct 28
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...d machine vision expert: david.tweed at gmail.com "while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." -- attempted insult seen on slashdot -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/771d8bde/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), > and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI > pieces, rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] libc++ "works" for us as well, but it can't self host. I don't know if your "works" and my definition of works is
2013 Oct 29
1
[LLVMdev] Non-deterministic behavior when using LoopInfo pass in LLVM
...Number of PHI nodes inserted 38 mem2reg - Number of alloca's promoted 20 mem2reg - Number of alloca's promoted with a single store -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/ccccb715/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...___________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/7344b1f5/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
2
how to Build .opus file
..._________________________________________ > > opus mailing list > > opus at xiph.org > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20131028/64398ece/attachment.htm
2013 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...;s much better to change no more than every two years or so. -- Brooks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/ee819230/attachment.sig>
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...t in the release notes (and the announcement email!) makes sense. We can make the switch a few weeks after the release if no one has strongly objected. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/b6125566/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...nd I think we'll learn a lot in the first step. This also helps stage out the inevitable "lets rewrite the codebase" churn over more time. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/2efb7aa9/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
6
Tired of dropouts and garbled phone calls - where to go next?
...mpany/85385> <http://plus.google.com/104980442218952272663/posts> <http://www.facebook.com/rimmkaufman> <http://www.RKGblog.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131028/8f2770cc/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
For those driving c++11 in clang/llvm - Would it generally be acceptable to have a "sunrise" period where the preliminary evaluation has been done (buildbots, compiler evaluate.. etc) and the 1st actual c++11 commit hits the repo. (30-60 days?) ------------- My concern/thoughts - When we swap out STDCXX for libc++ - We aren't able to self host clang. This could be entirely *our*
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump fails on bunch of archs
..., Sparc, .... this is due to the lack of support for disasm component of those archs in MC. any plan, roadmap, or anybody is thinking about fixing this? thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131028/17d36b64/attachment.html>