Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "201304".
Did you mean:
20130
2016 Nov 29
4
RFC: Constructing StringRefs at compile time
On 29 November 2016 at 17:38, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> I see, but I looked over your proposed implementation from earlier in the
> thread, and if I'm not mistaken I see this:
That's a different suggestion.
> That said, what did you think about my other proposal of the complicated UDL
> with macro?
>
> #define LIT(x) x_string_ref_literal
>
2016 Jul 11
2
Esperanza de vida librería 'demography'
...tengo representación de todas las edades, pero cuanto más antiguo el período, menos representación de edades 'elevadas' (porque mi histórico es limitado) ¿en qué período debo poner el límite para mantener el error en un límite razonable?.
Ejemplo de los datos:
Pop_201210
Pop_201301
Pop_201304
Evaporation_201210
Evaporation_201301
Evaporation_201304
Month 1
11.087
45.497
13.244
0,0489
0,0089
0,0280
Month 2
10.412
44.8...
2018 May 10
0
Using C++14 code in LLVM
...upport, which is
> GCC 6+.
Are you sure? I think you meant GCC 4.9 isn't going to cut it, ...
...
annoyed at the lack of relaxed constexpr function support, which is
GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html.
Relaxing requirements on constexpr functionsN36525__cpp_constexpr >= 201304
Roman.
> You can get GCC 6 for Ubuntu 16.04; I have it on my machine, though
> it's strangely not listed on packages.ubuntu.com for 16.04.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:20 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Well… Ubuntu 16.04 came...
2018 May 10
2
Using C++14 code in LLVM
Firefox's experience is that GCC 5 isn't going to cut it, especially
if you move to MSVC 2017, because people are going to be quickly
annoyed at the lack of relaxed constexpr function support, which is
GCC 6+.
You can get GCC 6 for Ubuntu 16.04; I have it on my machine, though
it's strangely not listed on packages.ubuntu.com for 16.04.
-Nathan
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:20 PM, via