Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches for "2012_r2".
2019 Jul 29
3
Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?
Hello Folks,
There seems to be contradicting sentences in the release notes for
4.11.0RC1:
Default schema updated to 2012_R2
---------------------------------
Default AD schema changed from 2008_R2 to 2012_R2. 2012_R2 functional level
is not yet available. Older schemas can be used by provisioning with the
'--base-schema' argument. Existing installations can be updated with the
samba-tool command "domain...
2019 Jun 13
2
Raise Domain functional level to 2012_R2
Hi,
I am trying to raise the Domain functional level to 2012_R2 from 2008 R2
using samba-too domain raise --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL command. But I
am receiving the error "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher
than the lowest function level of a DC!". How do we actually raise the
lowest functional level to change the functional & f...
2017 Feb 04
3
Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.6?
...ain level show
ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb
Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=facility,DC=local'
Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2
Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2
Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2
# samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level 2012_R2
ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb
ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level
of a DC!
# samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level 2012_R2
ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb
ERROR: Forest function level can't be higher than the domain function
level(s). Please raise...
2024 Mar 20
3
Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration
...e have running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
>
> The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 and Domain level 2008_R2.
>
> Can I confirm that the procedure to upgrade the three DCs is as follows:-
>
> 1) backup
> 2) upgrade domain and forest to latest 2012_R2
> 3) upgrade the schema to latest 2012_R2
>
> Also, in what order of DCs should I perform these changes?
>
> DC5 (FSMO Role)
> DC6
> DC7
Did anyone have a comment on this please?
--
Paul Littlefield
2019 Jun 13
2
Raise Domain functional level to 2012_R2
...eks before, maybe a entry in the
samba wiki would help ;)
Regards from Germany
Dirk
Am 13.06.19 um 18:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba:
> On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 20:48 +0530, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to raise the Domain functional level to 2012_R2 from 2008
>> R2
>> using samba-too domain raise --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL command. But
>> I
>> am receiving the error "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher
>> than the lowest function level of a DC!". How do we actually raise
>> the
&g...
2018 Apr 12
1
Raising Domain Level
G'day All,
We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows
dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2.
I am referencing:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels
We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was
2003.
However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be
a chicken and egg issue.
# sam...
2019 Jun 13
0
Raise Domain functional level to 2012_R2
...ld help ;)
>
> Regards from Germany
>
> Dirk
>
>
> Am 13.06.19 um 18:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba:
>> On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 20:48 +0530, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to raise the Domain functional level to 2012_R2 from 2008
>>> R2
>>> using samba-too domain raise --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL command. But
>>> I
>>> am receiving the error "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher
>>> than the lowest function level of a DC!". How do we actually ra...
2017 Feb 05
2
Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.6?
...day, February 4, 2017 7:57 PM
To: barış tombul <bbtombul at gmail.com>; samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: [Samba] Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.6?
Hello,
Am 04.02.2017 um 17:32 schrieb barış tombul via samba:
> # samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open
> of secrets.ldb
> ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function
> level of a DC!
>
> # samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open
> of secrets.ldb
> ERROR: Forest function level can't be higher than the...
2018 May 22
4
Functional Levels
HI!!
I have one question, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and --domain-level
is worked 2012/2012 R2 ?
samba-tool domain level --help
--forest-level=FOREST_LEVEL
The forest function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |
2012 | 2012_R2)
--domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL
The domain function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |
2012 | 2012_R2)
I see in wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels
but dont understan....
* Functional level is included for use against...
2019 Jul 29
0
Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?
On 29/07/2019 15:59, Luc Lalonde via samba wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> There seems to be contradicting sentences in the release notes for
> 4.11.0RC1:
>
> Default schema updated to 2012_R2
> ---------------------------------
>
> Default AD schema changed from 2008_R2 to 2012_R2. 2012_R2 functional level
> is not yet available. Older schemas can be used by provisioning with the
> '--base-schema' argument. Existing installations can be updated with the
> sa...
2024 Mar 25
1
SaMBa functional level
Hi,
I would like to connect our AD to the Azure AD. As I see, it needs 2012_R2
functional level. I don't have any Windows AD DC. Is it safe to raise the
functional level to 2012_R2 in production environment? I read that 4.19 has
initial support for 2019 schema, and for the 2016 functional level, but the
2012 support is still not complete.
Thanks,
Tamas Pisch
2018 May 22
1
Functional Levels
...uestion, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and
>> --domain-level is worked 2012/2012 R2 ?
>>
>> samba-tool domain level --help
>>
>>
>> --forest-level=FOREST_LEVEL
>> The forest function level (2003 | 2008 |
>> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2)
>> --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL
>> The domain function level (2003 | 2008 |
>> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2)
>>
>> I see in wiki
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels
>>
>> but dont understan....
&...
2019 Jul 29
2
Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?
...ng something...
On 2019-07-29 11:29 a.m., Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 15:59, Luc Lalonde via samba wrote:
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> There seems to be contradicting sentences in the release notes for
>> 4.11.0RC1:
>>
>> Default schema updated to 2012_R2
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>> Default AD schema changed from 2008_R2 to 2012_R2.? 2012_R2
>> functional level
>> is not yet available.? Older schemas can be used by provisioning with
>> the
>> '--base-schema' argument.? Existing install...
2017 Feb 01
1
Samba 4.5.2, 4.5.3, 4.5.4 as secondary DC to Windows 2008 R2
...domain functional level at 2008R2, which is what
> Samba has reasonable support for.
As this week I also looked into the functional levels that samba
supports, I must say that this wiki page:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels
looks as if samba 4.4 and later support 2012_R2.
I understand that this is not the case, but I feel that the info on the
wiki is (at least) confusing. (or even plain wrong)
MJ
2019 Apr 10
0
Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.6?
...t; To: barış tombul <bbtombul at gmail.com>; samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.6?
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 04.02.2017 um 17:32 schrieb barış tombul via samba:
>> # samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open
>> of secrets.ldb
>> ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function
>> level of a DC!
>>
>> # samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level 2012_R2 ldb_wrap open
>> of secrets.ldb
>> ERROR: Forest function level can...
2019 May 30
2
Integration Windows Server 2012
...what about 2016 / 19 Servers. Are there to many
Problems withe the new schema of the 2016 / 19 Server?
Another Question: what about the Forest function level and the Domain
function level that come out of the Box with Samba.
I use here Fedora 30 and the Levels are 2008_R2 and i can't raise to
2012_R2. Are there any plans to rise this up to a higher level out of
the box or is this only a Fedora Problem.
Regards
Dirk
2017 Jan 27
4
pwdLastSet, password required to change (samba vs MSAD)
...gt; Forest function level: (Windows) 2003
> Domain function level: (Windows) 2003
> Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2
> root at dc4:~/samba4#
Is it a risky operation to increase that level? From the docs I
understand that samba-4.4.4 should be able to go all the way up to
2012_R2. (we have no trusts, just three samba DCs and windows clients)
Suggestions, ideas what to look at to make password-change dialogues
functional, just as in a MSAD?
MJ
2016 Mar 12
1
Server 2012 functional level for Samba v4.4?
Hello Folks,
Just wondering were the development status is at for the 2012 functional level support.
At one point there was a mention that the developers were aiming for supporting this in Samba 4.4.x.
Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
- mainstream support end-date: 1/13/2015
- extended support end-date: 1/14/2020
So I guess no big rush…
Thanks again to the Samba developers.
2016 Apr 29
1
downgrade the Windows Server 2012 schema and run "domain join"
Hi list.
According to the Samba wiki, in order to join an additional Samba DC: The forests schema must be maximum at version 47 (Server 2008 R2) .
Then, is impossible to migrate from windows Server 2012/ 2012_R2 to Samba4 ?
What if I downgrade the schema version? Is that possible?
Regards, Phil.
2018 May 22
0
Functional Levels
...; HI!!
>
> I have one question, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and
> --domain-level is worked 2012/2012 R2 ?
>
> samba-tool domain level --help
>
>
> --forest-level=FOREST_LEVEL
> The forest function level (2003 | 2008 |
> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2)
> --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL
> The domain function level (2003 | 2008 |
> 2008_R2 | 2012 | 2012_R2)
>
> I see in wiki
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels
>
> but dont understan....
>
> * Functional level is...