search for: 20120821

...ORDING") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-one-touch-record:9] Set("SIP/1010-00000162", "AUDIOHOOK_INHERIT(MixMonitor)=yes") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-one-touch-record:10] MixMonitor("SIP/1010-00000162", "2012/08/21/out-7190000000-1010-20120821-183119-1345595479.530.wav,a,") in new stack == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/1010-00000162 -- Executing [s at macro-one-touch-record:11] Set("SIP/1010-00000162", "MON_FMT=wav") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-one-touch-record:12] Set("SIP/1010-00000162...

...optimizations will not interfere (hopefully). Will the debug info metadata be available always? If so, what are good pointers to explore? Thanks, -Prashantha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/94beef5c/attachment.html>

...fo metadata be available always? If so, what are good pointers to explore? Certainly no guarantee. Do you want your optimization to depend on debug info? -Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/59bec1c6/attachment.html>

Hi George, > When I compile llvm in release mode, the problem goes away! I don't understand? probably the function defined in the header is inlined into every function that calls it when optimization is turned on, but not when optimization is turned off. Ciao, Duncan.

...mmediately get complaints from tablegen until they update. Add a big red note to the release notes for those with out-of-tree targets that don't track trunk. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/333aecd6/attachment.html>

...| -load request ignored. I appreciate your help. Please help me fix it! regards, Ashwin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/9072ec4b/attachment.html>

...ansformation phase and I will make LoopInfo run as prepass for analysis. That should make LoopInfo valid when I run analysis and transform. Thanks, -Prashantha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/f671d7da/attachment.html>

In testing Asterisk 11, I've found that Asterisk doesn't seem to be sending BLF updates to SIP peers that have subscribed to a hint looking at a Custom device if that Custom device state is RINGING or RING_INUSE. All other states seem to be working correctly. The hint section of the dialplan is: [hints] exten => _3XX,hint,Custom:${EXTEN} Console shows the following for core show

Hi- I am writing a pass to traverse loops and collect some analysis data and later on come back to transform the IR. In the analysis phase I need to remember statistics regarding every loop in the program. What is the best way to uniquely remember a loop? Thanks, -Prashantha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...is requires us to do a global analysis followed by global transformations. What is the best way to structure the pass(es) in such a scenario? thanks, -Prashantha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/a3c019b4/attachment.html>

...<< "\n"; } } } -------------------------------------------- Qiuping Yi Institute Of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/3c8f6976/attachment.html>

On Aug 16, 2012, at 1:09 PM, "Rao, Prashantha" <Prashantha.Rao at amd.com> wrote: > Hi- > > I am writing a pass to traverse loops and collect some analysis data and later on come back to transform the IR. In the analysis phase I need to remember statistics regarding every loop in the program. What is the best way to uniquely remember a loop? Probably too late to help

On 08/21/2012 10:35 AM, George Baah wrote: > That is what I don't understand. This symbol is defined in Dominators.h, > which I include > in my file. I don't understand why I am getting this error. Here is my > opt command, > > "opt -load LLVMMyDomPass.dylib -mdp < test.bc > test.d.bc" It may also be that the relevant code is dead code eliminated, as it

...LLVM with --enable-shared > (autoconf) or BUILD_SHARED_LIBS (cmake). If this works, the dead code > elimination is probably the problem. > > Tobi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/67d3cc31/attachment.html>

On 08/21/2012 01:44 PM, George Baah wrote: > When I compile llvm in release mode, the problem goes away! I don't > understand? Interesting. I have no idea what is going on, but it would be interesting to investigate that. Tobi

...t;> understand? >> > > Interesting. I have no idea what is going on, but it would be interesting > to investigate that. > > Tobi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/272064b0/attachment.html>

On 08/21/2012 02:40 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi George, > >> When I compile llvm in release mode, the problem goes away! I don't understand? > > probably the function defined in the header is inlined into every function that > calls it when optimization is turned on, but not when optimization is turned > off. You can try to add it into include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h.

...________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120821/21ed6768/attachment.html>

George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> writes: > Hi Guys, > > I saw in the API that DominanceFrontier has been deprecated. Is this > for real? > I have read the computational issues but shouldn't that be left to the > users of llvm? > My concern is I am writing a Control Dependence module that uses > Dominance-Frontier information. > Getting rid of Dominance

Does rsync provide a way to remove files at the source that are present on the destination, without first transferring the files? I run the same task on several computers that copy the results to a server. Once the material is copied, it should be deleted at the source on all the machines. Say A and B run the same task. A finishes first and copies the result to server C. When B finishes, the