Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30 matches for "20120726".
Did you mean:
20100726
2012 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] Why is this assertion here?
...impleVT().SimpleTy < MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE &&
or
(unsigned)VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy < MVT::LAST_VECTOR_VALUETYPE &&
?
Thanks,
Micah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/ffcb2cf9/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 26
1
[LLVMdev] Question about ExpandPostRAPseudos.cpp
...and/or to suggest how this problem might best be fixed?
Thanks!
Preston
--
Preston Gurd <preston.gurd at intel.com>
Intel Waterloo
SSG/DPD/ECDL/DMP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/2ceaa157/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: CondCodeActions refactor (was RE: Why is this assertion here?)
...impleVT().SimpleTy < MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE &&
or
(unsigned)VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy < MVT::LAST_VECTOR_VALUETYPE &&
?
Thanks,
Micah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/42e32429/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 26
1
Asterisk Realtime issue after registering with x-lite
...ly to me.
--
Thanks and regards
Virendra Bhati
+91-9718300881
Asterisk Developer
E-mail-: virbhati at gmail.com
Skype id:- virbhati2
New Delhi(India)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120726/b5e75cca/attachment.htm>
2012 Jul 26
5
Auto logging-out client
Hi list!
I'm writing because of an issue I'm having with my Postfix-Dovecot
installation. Everything's working fine but when an IMAP client is idle
for some time, Dovecot automatically logs it out.
Jul 26 14:01:16 mail dovecot: imap(nicolas at devels.es): Disconnected:
Logged out bytes=1271/7439
This entails errors when trying to send e-mails after this auto logout,
such as:
2012 Jul 25
6
[LLVMdev] X86 FMA4
We're migrating to LLVM 3.1 and trying to use the upstream FMA patterns.
Why is VFMADDSD4 defined with vector types? Is this simply because the
gcc intrinsic uses vector types? It's quite unnatural if you have a
compiler that generates FMAs as opposed to requiring user intrinsics.
-Dave
2012 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: CondCodeActions refactor (was RE: Why is this assertion here?)
...kel
Postdoctoral Appointee
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ccsize.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2275 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/59a88290/attachment.bin>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] A pragma to turn the optimizations off
...a pragma to insert in my source that will turn the optimization off for that file. Could not find one, it is possible?
Thanks a lot,Moshe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/e713a744/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] Patch to incorporate lld test-suite into "make check-all"
...;, but retained the legacy "lld-test" target.
Regards
Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lld-tests.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3513 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/d3efb38e/attachment.obj>
2012 Jul 26
3
[LLVMdev] java frontend
Hi Folks,
Is a java frontend still being developed for llvm?
George
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/95b28fc7/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support
"Dmitry N. Mikushin" <maemarcus at gmail.com> writes:
> Proposal made by Tobias is very elegant, but it seems to be addressing
> the case when host and sub-architectures' code exist in the same time.
I don't know why that would have to be the case. Couldn't your
accelerator backend simply read in the proposed IR string and
optimize/codegen it?
> May I
2012 Jul 26
1
Empty argument in "executable = script ..." service
...and add
that empty argument I get the same cryptic error.
Regards
Florian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20120726/9394f6ee/attachment-0004.bin>
2012 Jul 27
0
[ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-mouse 1.8.0
...racle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/attachments/20120726/b89cbbd4/attachment.pgp>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] X86 FMA4
Because the intrinsics uses vector types (same as gcc).
- Jan
----- Original Message -----
> From: "dag at cray.com" <dag at cray.com>
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:26 PM
> Subject: [LLVMdev] X86 FMA4
>
> We're migrating to LLVM 3.1 and trying to use the upstream FMA patterns.
>
> Why is VFMADDSD4
2012 Jul 11
4
[LLVMdev] A problem with inline assembly in llvmc for ARM
Hi,
I encountered an issue with inline assembly in my c files compiled with llvmc.
When I have a push instruction in the inline assembly like:
__asm__ volatile ( "push {r4}\n\t" );
the compiler will drop the curly braces and leave it in the generated assembly file as: push r4
And this is non-conformant with the ARM
2012 Jul 26
1
[LLVMdev] X86 FMA4
...> gcc intrinsic uses vector types? It's quite unnatural if you have a
> > compiler that generates FMAs as opposed to requiring user intrinsics.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/23bfe115/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] clan -x assembler fails on vcvttsd2siq instruction
Hi Nobu,
> Thanks for response. Will this be fixed sometime soon?
did you open a bug report?
> Is there anything I can do to make it work in my copy of the latest llvm source?
Are you sure that
vcvttsd2siq %xmm0, %rax
is correct and this isn't a gcc bug?
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> Best,
> Nobu
>
> 2012/7/17 jj <h59213 at rtrtr.com>:
>> 片山 伸彦
2012 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] PROPOSAL: LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for intended fall-throughs between switch cases
...the bugs he found.
Alex: can you tell us how many FALLTHROUGH annotations would be required,
and how many bugs you found, when running this over LLVM and Clang?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/ca662685/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 18
2
[LLVMdev] clan -x assembler fails on vcvttsd2siq instruction
Hi all,
Thanks for response. Will this be fixed sometime soon?
Is there anything I can do to make it work in my copy of the latest llvm source?
Best,
Nobu
2012/7/17 jj <h59213 at rtrtr.com>:
> 片山 伸彦 <nobu.katayama <at> ipmu.jp> writes:
>
>>
>> Dear llvm developers,
>>
>> I am trying to run clang assembler to use avx instructions on Mac.
>>
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] X86 FMA4
...#39;s quite unnatural if you have a
> >>> compiler that generates FMAs as opposed to requiring user intrinsics.
> >>
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/cdf6fef6/attachment.html>