search for: 20111022

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "20111022".

2011 Oct 22
1
Dovecot crashes totally
...rsitaet Greifswald Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 12 17489 Greifswald Germany Tel. +49 3834 86-1456 Fax. +49 3834 86-1401 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: dovecot_nondefault.conf URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20111022/7b565015/attachment-0006.pl> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: mail.err URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20111022/7b565015/attachment-0007.pl> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attac...
2011 Oct 22
0
patch to add cairo support to Sweave (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)
...ts to some extent post-processing of cairo_pdf() > output. > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: R-Sweave-cairo.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2373 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20111022/fa25ce2b/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CairoTest.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 25366 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20111022/fa25ce2b/attachment.pdf>
2011 Oct 22
2
setacl fails - does not find dovecot-acl file
...iate any help to get this sorted out. Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4480 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20111022/3001cc0f/attachment-0004.bin>
2011 Oct 22
3
[LLVMdev] The make install fails in cross-compile mode
...argument. The patches are attached to this email. WBR -- Simon Atanasyan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cross_strip.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1124 bytes Desc: cross_strip.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111022/31e32741/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cross_strip.configure.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 5124 bytes Desc: cross_strip.configure.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111022/31e32741/attachmen...
2011 Oct 26
2
Bug#646660: xen: FTBFS: Checking check_python: ./check_python: 10: ./check_python: python2.6: not found
Source: xen Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111022 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory `/build/xen-njlTaX/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/check' > PYTHON=python2.6 LIBXENAPI_BINDINGS=n ACM_S...
2011 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] Question about local variables
It looks like the AsmWriter is generating the local variables (SlotNum)s on the fly in that file (AsmWriter.cpp), so is there any way at all to get this information from the operation itself, via Instruction, Value or Type? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111021/55f4887c/attachment.html>
2011 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Question about local variables
Ryan Taylor wrote: > It looks like the AsmWriter is generating the local variables (SlotNum)s > on the fly in that file (AsmWriter.cpp), so is there any way at all to > get this information from the operation itself, via Instruction, Value > or Type? Nope! As you noticed, they're created on the fly... ...when the Value or Type is anonymous. If you want them to be persistent,
2011 Oct 22
1
handling of final partial block in rsync
Greetings, I have been using the rsync C source as a guide for porting the rsync algorithm to Java. This has been successful, but there is one low level detail I am having some issues with. Assuming the default block size of 700 bytes, when stepping through the file and generating checksums for each block it is very likely that there will be a partial block at the end of the file. Right now
2011 Nov 02
2
[Bug 8565] New: rsync hangs when using --only-write-batch and --hard-links
...ed result: rsync exits normally (leaving behind a well-formed batch_file) or at least exits with an error Actual result: rsync hangs indefinitely, causing any script which called it to wait on it forever I confirmed the issue with the sources in http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/nightly/rsync-HEAD-20111022-1730GMT.tar.gz but 3.0.9 was already affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
2011 Oct 22
1
bugzilla.samba.org is down
...as problems after an update, we're working on it. metze -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20111022/86b82288/attachment.pgp>
2011 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] error building clang
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, monica j wrote: > The latest in my problems building clang-only: > > llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang > /llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/libclangLex.a: could not read symbols: File > format not recognized > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status What is the output of file /llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/libclangLex.a ? Csaba -- GCS
2011 Oct 22
1
[LLVMdev] error building clang
...s. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus > Torvalds > "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111022/8c7012db/attachment.html>
2011 Oct 20
4
Running R with browser without installing anything
Dear all, the company I work for has Matlab installed for statistical/mathematical calculations and really not ready to go with R (even installing exe file for R). Therefore I was wondering is it possible to do analysis R using browser like IE, without installing anything? Thanks for your suggestion. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2011 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Question about local variables
Ryan Taylor wrote: > Nick, > > Unfortunately this doesn't answer my question I don't think. It > seems that -instnamer, as you mention, names the instructions but still > does not name the local variables. What other local variables are you referring to? When AsmWriter prints "%y = add i32 %x, 1", the name of that add instruction is "y" and
2011 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] error building clang
The latest in my problems building clang-only: llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang /llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/libclangLex.a: could not read symbols: File format not recognized collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Any suggestions appreciated. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2011 Oct 22
9
[LLVMdev] Question about local variables
...persistent, > values can have names via. the setName() call. "opt -instnamer" will name > all your instructions, for example. > > Nick > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111022/d9b7d682/attachment.html>
2011 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > > A new patch is attached that is *much* less of a rough draft. Sorry for any confusion due to the early state of the patch. > > Thanks, Chandler. This is great stuff. >
2011 Oct 21
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > > A new patch is attached that is *much* less of a rough draft. Sorry for > any confusion due to the early state of the patch. > > Thanks, Chandler. This is great stuff. > > > Still, I never intended this to be