search for: 20110917

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "20110917".

Did you mean: 20110817
2011 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Memmove vs Dead Code Elimination
...on - From a and b, a malloc/free pair would be remain which will be removed then I hope you can implement some optimization rules to achieve that improvement ;) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/9b1cabe6/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: stringref.ll Type: application/octet-stream Size: 13929 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/9b1cabe6/attachment.obj>
2011 Sep 17
1
How to contribute a patch for ocfs2/ocfs2-tool/ocfs2-test project?
...o? In addition, I haven't found latest ocfs2 git repos. Is the following right? http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.8.git;a=summary Thanks in advance, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20110917/3cffa2e7/attachment.html
2011 Sep 17
1
[LLVMdev] make check-all glitch cmake vs. configure on FreeBSD 8.2
Hi, I noticed that the following regression tests fail when building a config generated with CMake. When building with a config generated with configure, all is well. I get the same results when using gcc-4.2.1 and clang-trunk. It seems to me that there's a glitch in de CMake config somewhere. I doing a verbose build right now to investigate, but maybe someone already knows what's
2011 Sep 17
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 doesn't seem to work with basedir of /
...this code seems to be almost obsolete)? -- Regards, Matthew Cengia -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20110917/08d0a375/attachment.pgp>
2011 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM
...nificantly improved performance. Will the LLVM developers be interested in adding more precise latency info for the x86 target? Thank you in advance! -Ghassan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/d6009555/attachment.html>