Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "20110917".
Did you mean:
20110817
2011 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Memmove vs Dead Code Elimination
...on
- From a and b, a malloc/free pair would be remain which will be removed
then
I hope you can implement some optimization rules to achieve that improvement
;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/9b1cabe6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: stringref.ll
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 13929 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/9b1cabe6/attachment.obj>
2011 Sep 17
1
How to contribute a patch for ocfs2/ocfs2-tool/ocfs2-test project?
...o?
In addition, I haven't found latest ocfs2 git repos. Is the following right?
http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.8.git;a=summary
Thanks in advance,
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20110917/3cffa2e7/attachment.html
2011 Sep 17
1
[LLVMdev] make check-all glitch cmake vs. configure on FreeBSD 8.2
Hi,
I noticed that the following regression tests fail when building a
config generated with CMake. When building with a config generated with
configure, all is well. I get the same results when using gcc-4.2.1 and
clang-trunk.
It seems to me that there's a glitch in de CMake config somewhere. I
doing a verbose build right now to investigate, but maybe someone
already knows what's
2011 Sep 17
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 doesn't seem to work with basedir of /
...this code seems to be almost obsolete)?
--
Regards,
Matthew Cengia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20110917/08d0a375/attachment.pgp>
2011 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM
...nificantly improved performance. Will the LLVM developers be
interested in adding more precise latency info for the x86 target?
Thank you in advance!
-Ghassan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110917/d6009555/attachment.html>