search for: 20110819

...00000bf7ec000 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000ffc00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) (XEN) 0000000100000000 - 0000000340000000 (usable) (XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000FA340, 0014 (r0 ACPIAM) (XEN) ACPI: RSDT BF780000, 003C (r1 7522MT A7522800 20110819 MSFT 97) (XEN) ACPI: FACP BF780200, 0084 (r1 7522MT A7522800 20110819 MSFT 97) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT BF780480, 6D1A (r1 A7522 A7522800 800 INTL 20051117) (XEN) ACPI: FACS BF78E000, 0040 (XEN) ACPI: APIC BF780390, 00AC (r1 7522MT A7522800 20110819 MSFT 97) (XEN) ACPI: MCFG BF78044...

...----------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:26:31 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1187 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 dovecot - security update To: centos-announce at centos.org Message-ID: <20110819122631.GA18674 at sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1187 dovecot security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1187.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is c...

...think Git's branching and history model makes more sense, as a command-line tool I find Mercurial significantly easier to use for day-to-day work.) -- Talin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/807d7d0d/attachment.html>

...ion plan was written: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/ Hi guys, Just to be absolutely clear here, Mercurial is not being considered. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/448902f2/attachment.html>

...s work fine when generated on random test plots. I have attached the matrix and a pdf of my plot. Thanks in advance, Sumukh -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Matrix.txt URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110819/6cc889ff/attachment.txt> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: axis_fail.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 48475 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110819/6cc889ff/attachment.pdf>

...e following I8* tmp0 = i8* bitcast (i32 (i32)* @pthread_cancel to i8* I1 tmp = icmp ne i8* tmp0, i8* null br i1 tmp, label %bb23, label %bb25 Thanks Sreekumar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/537b1cff/attachment.html>

...M online demo, but how can I perform that programmatically using IRBuilder? Are there some LLVM code examples less trivial than Kaleidoscope? Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/2a9c608e/attachment.html>

Hi, all I found in some cases the int variable get promoted to i64, although I think it should i32. I use the online demo (http://llvm.org/demo). And below is the test case. ------------- test case ------------- int test(int x[], int y[], int n) { int i = 0; int sum = 0; for ( ; i < n; i++) { sum += x[i] * y[i]; } return sum; } ------------------------------------- No

Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful to know what the roadmap is. Thanks! -Dave

...t test(int x[], int y[], int n) { > int i = 0; > int sum = 0; > for ( ; i < n; i++) { > sum += x[i] * y[i]; > } > return sum; > } -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/c64b2680/attachment.html>

...tp://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110819/ee9a3b90/attachment-0005.sig>

...tp://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110819/2ee2d084/attachment-0005.sig>

...tp://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110819/0f49b2a9/attachment-0005.sig>

...tp://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110819/d0067bb1/attachment-0005.sig>

..."SUBSYSTEMS" but which one am I supposed to use in this case? I can provide more info if necessary, just let me know. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20110819/18d244fd/attachment.html>

I need to upgrade PHP because the latest WordPress requires one at least at 5.2.4. What are the tradeoffs of using the php53 packages provided by CentOS versus IUS? I've seen that installing the RHEL-derived php53 requires removing php first and it creates package conflicts because it doesn't provide a virtual php-common package. That suggests I should install the IUS package. Is

...Why would you be using such an old version of wine? > Because he's a spammer testing the waters. Please don't reply to such posts. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20110819/2d1442f7/attachment.htm> Set your email to send plain text only.

...lopers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110819/0b167c23/attachment.html>

On 7/12/11 4:11 PM, Jinwook Shin (HOTWING) wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to implement a module pass as a share object to process an > entire program as a unit. The target program is built from multiple > object files, hence multiple bitcode files. However, it seems that opt > does not take the whole program, but just one bitcode file, "test.bc" > in the

Hi, I'm trying to implement a module pass as a share object to process an entire program as a unit. The target program is built from multiple object files, hence multiple bitcode files. However, it seems that opt does not take the whole program, but just one bitcode file, "test.bc" in the example run shown below. $ opt -load mypass.dylib -mymodulepass < test.bc > /dev/null