search for: 20110109

Anybody notice log delays in this list, and very small amount of traffic? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110109/576a9b0e/attachment.htm>

...i, I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where? regards Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110109/de7031f2/attachment-0002.html>

...representing stack slots. Physical registers get 1 .. 2^30-1. /jakob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1929 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110109/14fb5266/attachment.bin>

Hi all, Is there a pass that computes livein information for each MachineBasicBlock? I tried to find such a pass but could not find any. I am trying to use the livein information to get dead registers to insert some instructions right before code emission but the livein information seems to be invalidated by some pass. I might need to recompute the livein information before my pass. Thanks a

We might want to make physical registers negative and virtuals positive, or vice versa. Then FirstVirtualRegister is 0 or 1, and we could get rid of those annoying subtractions of FirstVirtualRegister all over the virtual-register-handling passes. Since 0 is used all over the place as "invalid register" it is probably best to leave this alone, let FirstVirtualRegister be 1, and simply

Hi Any ideas on how I can represent readonly registers? I do not want any register allocation/liveness analysis to happen for these. thanks dz

...Mobile: 1 (530) 320-9025 eMail: dennisb /at/ chronometrics /dot/ com http://www.chronometrics.com/crs/index.html <http://www.chronometrics.com/crs/index.html> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20110109/9686b906/attachment.htm

I am sorry but it seems like this should be a simple answer. when i run a any rake command i get the following error: no such file to load -- spec/rake/spectask i amusing bundler and have the latest rspec installed. any idea? make dev tough when you can not do any rake tasks...

Hi all, I am having a small problem with a catch-all user I have setup in my Postfix/Dovecot setup. I am not 100% sure this is Dovecot related, but, logic tells me it is. I have a virtual user called @reinhold.dk setup to redirect to my main account, peter at reinhold.dk. If I send a spam mail (GTUBE) to peter at reinhold.dk, the mail is marked with Amavis x-headers as it should be. If I

Hi Everyone, I want to know each and every parameter's detail that can be included in the read= write= in manager.conf Where can I find this? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110107/eacb9f1a/attachment.htm>

...d. Asterisk just passes that DTMF on to the caller and the call parking never happens. Shouldn't I be able to park a call more than once? -- Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110109/1510b069/attachment.htm>

...tion->logical volume management comes whereas in centos5.3 i don't see the option logical volume management under system->administration. How to see it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110109/5f6917d0/attachment-0002.html>

...or "copied" from the laptop to the hard disk. Also I am not able to change permissions of files on the hard disk. What can I do to resolve the problem? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110109/d7ea2d28/attachment-0002.html>

...headers should match the kernel geometry that it was compiled for? confused. TIA Rob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rkampen.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 329 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110109/eeb43522/attachment-0002.vcf>

...lking with a dummy AD server. Any insights/suggestions/opinions/recommendations would be appreciated, especially before I get waste deep. Regards, Edgar Valdes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110109/e158ce19/attachment-0002.html>

...bdevice #1 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: VT1708S Digital [VT1708S Digital] Subdevices: 0/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 -- Regards, ?ukasz Holetzke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20110109/7f85976f/attachment.htm>

Happy new year :D i have just installed centos 5.5 on my vmware to test my server,i found that i need nasm x64 to compile my assembly code,the yum database only has 0.98 version which does not support 64bit. the nasm version 2(rpm from offcial site) requires glibc 2.7, i know its a core component, but is there a way to upgrade it without break system? thanks for your time :D NamoBhagavan Max

On 01/07/2011 02:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Unless your goal is to merge this work onto LLVM mainline, the best thing to do is a local hack in your tree. > > -Chris Yes, I will create a patch for my tree to increase FirstVirtualRegister. Would this be a good change to include in 2.9?

On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:04 AM, akramul azim wrote: > Hi > > I am using LLVM and LLVM-GCC from SVN (version number: 122880). And I am using arm-2009q1-176-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-mingw32.tar.bz2 or arm-2007q3-51-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2. I tried the automated scripts (create-snapshots.sh and build-install-linux.sh) that are in the LLVM repository for building

Hi Jean-Marc, thanks for the response. First, I will clarify again that floating-point solves this - so isn't that a bug in fixed-point? Also, I understand that algorithmically the AEC won't cancel echo properly on a non-linear signal, but why completely distort the output? If the echo just won't get cancelled it would be acceptable, but in the current state it disables the ability to