search for: 200x60

....163 user system elapsed user system elapsed 3.803 0.271 4.075 3.868 0.296 4.163 user system elapsed user system elapsed 4.184 0.273 4.457 4.238 0.302 4.540 So with the modification, transpose for a 60x200 or 200x60 matrix is about a factor of two faster on the Intel system, and a factor of six faster on the SPARC system. There is little or no gain from the modification when transposing a row or column vector, however. (I think it must be that on these machines multiplies and divides do not take constant tim...

...of patch-matprod regarding LDOUBLE. There is no change regarding this issue due to this patch, however. patch-transpose Speeds up the transpose operation (the "t" function) from detailed code improvements. Relevant test script: test-transpose.r The improvement for 200x60 matrices is about a factor of two. There is little or no improvement for long row or column vectors. patch-vec-arith Speeds up arithmetic on vectors of the same length, or when on vector is of length one. This is done with detailed code improvements. Relevant test script: t...

...of patch-matprod regarding LDOUBLE. There is no change regarding this issue due to this patch, however. patch-transpose Speeds up the transpose operation (the "t" function) from detailed code improvements. Relevant test script: test-transpose.r The improvement for 200x60 matrices is about a factor of two. There is little or no improvement for long row or column vectors. patch-vec-arith Speeds up arithmetic on vectors of the same length, or when on vector is of length one. This is done with detailed code improvements. Relevant test script: t...